Quote# 135806

Beatrix von Storch: German police accuse AfD politician of hate incitement over anti-Muslim tweet
‘What the hell is wrong with this country? Why is the official page of police in NRW tweeting in Arabic? Are they seeking to appease the barbaric, Muslim, rapist hordes of men?

Ms von Storch, a member of anti-immigrant Alternative for Germany (AfD) party, posted the message that was later deleted by Twitter AP

German police have asked prosecutors to investigate a far-right lawmaker for possible incitement to hatred, after she criticised a police force for tweeting in Arabic “to appease the barbaric, Muslim, rapist hordes of men”.

Police in the state of North Rhine-Westphalia (NRW) posted a New Year’s Eve greeting in Arabic as well as German, English and French.

Cologne, a city where groups of mainly Arab immigrants were accused of sexual assaults at New Year’s Eve celebrations two years ago, is located in the state.

“What the hell is wrong with this country? Why is the official page of police in NRW tweeting in Arabic,” Beatrix von Storch, a member of the anti-immigrant Alternative for Germany (AfD) party, wrote in a Dec. 31 tweet that was later deleted by Twitter after receiving complaints from members of the public.

“Are they seeking to appease the barbaric, Muslim, rapist hordes of men?” she added.

Twitter suspended her account for some 12 hours after she posted the message, saying it breached the website’s rules that bar users from posting hateful content.

Social media platforms face hefty fines in Germany if they fail to remove hateful posts swiftly, and companies like Facebook and Twitter have hired extra staff to monitor such messages.

The NRW police deployed large numbers of officers to secure New Year’s street parties in large cities this year, and said celebrations were largely peaceful.
Read more

Prosecutors in NRW must first decide whether they should deal with the police complaint against von Storch, or transfer the case to Berlin authorities where her constituency is.

If prosecutors deem there is sufficient grounds to launch an official criminal investigation against von Storch, they would first have to ask parliament to suspend her immunity before proceeding with a case.

Cologne Chief Prosecutor Ulf Willuhn said prosecutors must now decide whether von Storch’s message amounted to “inciting people to commit violence against a certain section of society”.

Twitter also deleted a message by AfD member Alice Weidel, in which she said German authorities wanted Germans to live with criminal mobs of migrants.

The AfD won seats in parliament for the first time in September, riding a wave of discontent against Chancellor Angela Merkel’s decision in 2015 to open Germany’s borders to more than a million asylum-seeking migrants.

The AfD, which says Islam is incompatible with the German constitution, is the third largest party in parliament. It has upended German politics by stealing voters from Merkel’s conservatives and the centre-left Social Democrats, making coalition building more difficult.

AfD leaders reacted angrily to Twitter’s decision to delete the two postings under a new law passed by parliament in June that authorises fines of up to €50m (£44.3m) against social media networks if they don’t promptly remove hateful content.

“The censorship law of Justice Minister Heiko Maas has already showed on the first day of the year its ability to curtail freedom of expression,” said AfD co-leader Alexander Gauland.

“I call on every social media user to take action against such oppression by reposting the deleted comments again and again!”

Beatrix von Storch, The Independent 5 Comments [1/7/2018 10:23:18 AM]
Fundie Index: 0
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 132301

After spending weeks hyping a new comic book series promising to spark outrage among progressive comic book fans, alt-right activist Theodore Beale—known online as Vox Day—has delivered: A trailer for the “Alt-Hero” comic book series has been released.

Beale managed to raise more than $32,000 overnight after releasing the trailer, meeting what he said was his first fundraising goal toward the creation of the comic series. The fundraising page claims the comic is “intended to challenge and eventually replace the SJW-converged comics of DC and Marvel.” (“SJW” is Alt-Right shorthand for “social justice warrior.”)

Beale told his fans that major comic makers are “methodically, purposefully, absolutely attempting to destroy every value—every American value, every Western value, every Christian value that they can get their hands on” by creating spinoffs of popular comic series that depict classic characters as black, female and Muslim. Beale’s answer to that perceived attack is to fund the creation of a comic series that features “triggering” white characters that smoke cigarettes, wear Confederate flag costumes and combat left-wing protesters.

The trailer, which was debuted yesterday, features a character that is “doing the job the police don’t want to” and “cleaning up the streets one illegal at a time.” The series promises “storylines, not social justice” and revolves around a collection of superhuman heroes that defy a United Nations “Superhuman Protection Council” and act as vigilante crime fighters who apparently use their rogue status to target undocumented immigrants and left-wing protesters.

As Beale describes it:

"What I found the most interesting was the idea that anything short of an undefined “success”, which as we all know will be redefined and re-redefined as Alt??Hero meets with the usual metrics of success over time, is tantamount to “sad humilation”. Think about how twisted one’s psyche has to be to make that connection, and what a crushing fear of failure one would have to have in order to think that way.

That is the heart of the SJW, which is not only terrified of failure, but is terrified that someone, somewhere, will be successful doing something of which the SJW does not approve.

Of course, SJWs have good reason to be terrified of Alt??Hero. Because they know they are the true villains and the enemy in the cultural war."

Vox Day, Right Wing Watch 30 Comments [9/29/2017 11:23:05 AM]
Fundie Index: 9
Submitted By: Demon Duck of Doom

Quote# 46564

Q: Should we declare independence from the Atheists?

Details: I am preparing a speech where I propose that the holy American nation should extricate itself from the web of evil in our midst.

"Verily I say unto you: There comes a moment in a nation's history where, for the good and welfare of the people, and the sanctity of its values and institutions, one must act to preserve its integrity and its divine destiny.

We maintain these truths to be self-evident. All men are created by the Almighty and are endowed with unalienable rights: namely, that o life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.

The Atheist Tyrant, being in denial of the author of these rights, has rejected the principles and the ideals by which are nation was founded.
It is, therefore, imperative that we act to severe any link to the Atheist and his perverse ways.

Let us , my friends and fellow patriots, declare our independence from the Atheist Mafia!"

What do you think?

Pastor Winthrop III, Yahoo! Answers 68 Comments [9/3/2008 12:25:31 PM]
Fundie Index: 2
Submitted By: Bumble Bear

Quote# 132410

This article offers an alternative hypothesis as to the reason why transgenderism has become the cause celebre du jour of Cathedral elites. The ordinary hypothesis, based on works like those of Paul Gottfried, says that transgenderism is an example of left-wing virtue-signaling and the escalating competition to be more holy than the next person. In an attempt to raise one’s status, the leftist must embrace more extreme signals of egalitarianism than others of his cohort. Thus, left-wing signaling is an arms race in which leftists are trapped by the terms of their religious status system in an escalating spiral to see who can find the most radical, most irrational expression of egalitarian ideas.

Instead, consider an additive hypothesis: the Cathedral elite know full well that transgender individuals are mentally ill and have chosen to embrace this cause for ulterior motives, as there is something inherent in the issue that provides them an advantage. Transgenderism is Type 1 Propaganda, and its primary targets are not loyal leftists, but individuals on the marginal Right capable of swinging either for or against the Cathedral.

What are these “types” of propaganda? In the collection of rhetorician Richard Weaver’s essays entitled In Defense of Tradition, Weaver describes the different forms which propaganda can take and their intended effects. Type 1 Propaganda is the “Big Lie” of the Soviet Union or Orwell’s 1984. The nature of the “Big Lie” is that the lie should be so big and so obvious that no sane person could believe it.

Superficially, this form of propaganda would be similar to the Chinese loyalty test referred to as “Point Deer Make Horse.” The difference is how the lie is used. As a loyalty test, the “Big Lie” is meant to distinguish those who will lie from those who will not lie for the authorities. As a form of propaganda, the loyalties of the targets are already known: they are enemies. Instead, the lie is a form of psychological torture meant to degrade and demean members of the opposition. Consider the following quote from Theodore Dalrymple:

In my study of communist societies, I came to the conclusion that the purpose of communist propaganda was not to persuade or convince, not to inform, but to humiliate; and therefore, the less it corresponded to reality the better. When people are forced to remain silent when they are being told the most obvious lies, or even worse when they are forced to repeat the lies themselves, they lose once and for all their sense of probity. To assent to obvious lies is…in some small way to become evil oneself. One’s standing to resist anything is thus eroded, and even destroyed. A society of emasculated liars is easy to control. I think if you examine political correctness, it has the same effect and is intended to.

Weaver explains that this form of propaganda is aimed at demeaning, humiliating, and eroding the self-respect of those who oppose the regime. It is an expression of pure power, in that the propagandist can force the victim to repeat a doctrine that both people know is untrue. There is no potential gain for the propagandist except insofar his enemy is psychological broken and defeated. There is no intention for the “Big Lie” to have any effect outside the torture chamber. Whether or not transgender individuals are accepted by society is irrelevant to the exercise of power by the Cathedral elites over marginally right-wing individuals.

The best illustration of this type of propaganda is the famous scene from 1984 when O’Brien asks Winston how many fingers he is holding up. O’Brien knows that he is holding up four fingers. He knows that Winston knows there are four fingers. O’Brien is not trying to torture Winston to the point that he will forever be incapable of distinguishing four and five fingers. O’Brien is simply exercising power by demonstrating that Winston is utterly powerless and that his very words and actions are controlled by the Party. As soon as he walks out of the room, O’Brien does not care how many fingers Winston sees, only that Winston recognizes the power O’Brien, and by extension the Party, wields over him.

In the end, Winston’s broken state is such that he no longer feels the capacity to resist the Party. When Winston says that he “loves Big Brother” at the end, this is not to be taken as an act of will, that somehow he has been “brainwashed” and now believes in Ingsoc. Winston has been hollowed of the capacity to love at all. The only thing he is capable of doing is mimicking the commands of the Party. Insofar as he “loves” Big Brother, he is simply repeating the motions commanded by the Party robotically.

Likewise, the promotion of transgenderism is aimed at instilling such a state on the members of the marginal Right, which the Cathedral understand to be subject to radicalization. The Cathedral understands that the Outer Right will outright reject the propaganda, but doesn’t need transgenderism as a kind of loyalty test. The Outer Right has outed itself in a multitude of ways prior to this particular propaganda campaign. These days, one merely needs to look at a person’s Twitter or Facebook to identify them as loyal or disloyal to the Cathedral. Instead, this propaganda is aimed at religious and socially conservative or moderate individuals who are politically centrist or center-right. The threat is implicit: either admit that the man in a dress is a woman, or we will take away your job, take away your respectability in the community, send CPS after your children, and otherwise destroy your life.

To take it one step further, examine the various media pieces about how straight men are bigots because they won’t have sex with transsexual “women:” the implicit threat here is chilling. The message from the Cathedral mouthpieces is that the time is coming when dissenters will be told that they must copulate with a transgender or be punished by the regime. What could be a greater exercise of pure power than forcing your opponents to participate in soul-destroying sexual depravity and to pretend to enjoy it? Can one imagine a more powerful means of psychological destroying an opponent than to command them to defile their body and call it an act of love?

The typical individual this is aimed at is a moderate Republican who thinks John McCain is a hero for his military service, attends a traditional church but wants a little compassion for homosexuals, and who lives in a 90%+ white neighborhood, but says race has nothing to do with the flourishing of his community. He is understood by the Cathedral to be potentially disloyal, even if he is not disloyal at this moment. If he gets robbed at gunpoint by a young black man or if a member of his church gets sued for not baking a gay marriage cake, he could very well radicalize. Therefore, the Cathedral needs to get to him first. While his children can be converted via public education and mass-media propaganda, it’s much harder to change the mind of a grown adult. Therefore, the Cathedral focuses on blackpilling through propaganda.

As described in the Dalrymple quote, being forced to call Bruce Jenner a woman is only part of the blackpilling effect of Type 1 Propaganda. Being marched into the Boss’s office and having to lie about one’s beliefs do erode the self-respect of the victim. What makes this form of propaganda more insidious is that every person who submits to it participates in the attack on other dissenters. Type 1 Propaganda is more than just O’Brien and Winston in a small room; it’s the Two Minute Hates in public as well. When our moderate Republican submits to intimidation and spouts the transgender lie, he participates in pressuring others to submit to the lie, give up their self-respect, and resign themselves to apathy and helplessness in the face of Cathedral tyranny. In his assent, he becomes an agent of the Cathedral and an ideological Stasi agent no different than the one who attacked him.

Transgender individuals are puppets of his system. Their ultimate fate is irrelevant to the question at hand, and any discussion on the right about “compassion” or “understanding” is a non sequitur. Just like the Civil Rights movement, once the Cathedral gains its objective the superficial justification for the campaign is cast aside. Once the Cathedral demolished the ability of local competing political elites to resist the power of their national institutions, the plight of the black community was not longer relevant to left-wing politics, except insofar as they could be leveraged for further objectives such as nationalizing and centralizing law enforcement.

Likewise, acting like transgenderism has anything to do with helping actual transgender individuals makes one a participant in propaganda and a willing dupe.

Ultimately, the goal which the Cathedral has set for transgenderism is to blackpill the marginal Right into silence and compliance. The terror of retaliation by the political elites is used to instill the kind of hopelessness and passivity which would prevent individuals on the Right from breaking out of the false consciousness of Cathedral ideology and recognizing their true interests in removing the Cathedral from power.

They don’t need the men on the Right to physically cut off their genitals because the Cathedral is commanding them to do it psychologically.

How many genders am I holding up, Winston?

Arthur Gordian, Social Matter 13 Comments [10/1/2017 11:11:29 AM]
Fundie Index: 8

Quote# 15443


Throughout the history of mankind, coldhearted criminals who have committed the heinous crime of murder, have sought various ways to keep from being rightfully punished by the government for their murders. Many have not been successful in their endeavors. However, there is a class of criminals who have been quite successful. Below is a list of means they are using in america to get away with not only a single murder, but mass murder. If you want to murder BIG TIME and get away with it, these are some of the things you must do.
1. Get so-called "experts" to make the words "TERMINAL ILLNESS" mean that a person will most definitely always have the illness without the remotest possiblity of getting well, get foolish legislators to make the concept legal, and then legally put to death those who are "TERMINALLY ILL" who are depleting your financial resources, or those who ask to die.
2. Get so-called "experts" to classify certain members of the human race as being non-humans and get foolish legislators to make the classification legal.
3. Get chosen as a member of a state's pardon and parole board so that you can let out of prison murderous recidivists who will murder again.
4. Become a high government official, particularly president, federal judge or legislator.
5. Get rich.
6. Become a defense attorney so that you can defend murderers.
7. Live in a state that doesn't have the death penalty and kill as many people as you desire.
8. If you hate children and like to put to death innocent people, become an abortion doctor or an abortion doctor's assisstant.
9. If you hate people who are terminally ill, pretend to have a deep love and mercy for them in their sufferings and kill them.
10. Kill someone and pretend you are insane.
11. Murder someone before you turn 18.
12. Be a female
13. Receive the sympathy of the satanic news media and anti-death penalty special interest groups.
14. In the ring, hit him hard enough if you are a famous boxer.
15. Be the jury's hero
16. Hire a famous attorney who really knows his stuff about the murderous american constitution.
17. Become a pathologist, and go into business assisting the so-called "TERMINALLY ILL" to commit suicide.
18. Get nominated as a supreme court justice and decide who has a "constitutional" right to live and who doesn't.
19. If you want to hire someone to perform a murder for you, hire anyone of the people in the positions we have named above. But in order to get away with the murder, it MUST be done "legally" or "constitutionally."
Lobby against the death penalty and get foolish legislators to make laws against the death penalty. Then kill or have killed the person or people you hate.

Robert T. Lee, tencommandments.org 40 Comments [9/29/2006 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 7
Submitted By: Redhunter

Quote# 135804

Intellectual understanding is never the answer to many things.  It has its usefulness but should not be over stated.

The objective of the Robin is to fly, not to understand its own flight mechanism. 

This is where life becomes intricate. We have evolved an ability to understand things intellectually. It is useful but perhaps we are over doing it. Intellectual understanding can become an obsessive need just like other needs.  

Spirituality and religions try to wean us away from too much of intellectualism.

Sriram, Religion and Ethics 9 Comments [1/7/2018 10:22:59 AM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: NearlySane

Quote# 111345

You don’t need to prove the existence of God to unbelievers. That is so not your job. If God wants to confirm His reality to some snarky little soul, He’s more than capable. It is an utter waste of time to get uptight over what God haters say. These folks are just lashing out in anger as a response to God not being who they want Him to be. They are caught in a classic battle of wills: they want to define the terms of the relationship, God is refusing to let them, and now they are trying to find some new way to manipulate Him by publicly defying Him. It’s like the pesky brother who wants his sister’s attention. Since she isn’t giving him any, he starts poking her with a stick until she lashes out at him. To the brother, negative attention is better than no attention. He just wants to be focused on.

Vocal atheists come in two basic varieties: those who scoff that there is no real evidence for God, and those who claim to have once been Christians, yet now they realize the whole thing was a sham. And while they claim to not be trying to shove their beliefs on anyone else, they are so very bothered by those who do believe. Why? If we’re all going to die like dogs and that’s the end of it, what does it matter if we spend our lives caught up in delusions? Don’t these people read their children bedtime stories? Don’t they watch movies and read books? Fantasy can uplift and inspire. If they really believe Christianity is a delusion, they ought to appreciate the fact that it instills a sense of morals in people. What’s the alternative? If we all decide that this life is it, then there is no justification for practicing any degree of self-restraint. We should all be robbing and ravaging each other every day because all that matters is right now.

Atheists like to promote themselves as freedom fighters who are trying to unburden the rest of us from unhealthy delusions. But what do they have to offer us instead? A brief, pointless existence? That doesn’t sound like an upper. Believing that one’s existence is devoid of all meaning will drive us into suicide. If human life is nothing more than the result of some freak collisions of random molecules, then how can it be said to have any value?

Anna Diehl, The Pursuit of God 30 Comments [8/1/2015 3:39:05 AM]
Fundie Index: 9

Quote# 135733

Is our kneejerk reaction to paedophilia more harmful than helpful?

I've always wondered the same thing. It's pretty similar to my line on rape recovery, actually. I don't see why it should be much different for children. Children ARE more resilient than adults when it comes to actual trauma, like war and abuse. The everyday stuff like breakups, perhaps not so much, but kids can grow up in a war zone and not suffer the rates of PTSD their elders do.

One of the thing I hear a lot from grown survivors of sexual abuse as children is a literally whispered, "I know this is awful to say, but sometimes it kinda felt good." The shame and humiliation dripping off them is palpable. That shame over a perfectly normal bodily reaction is, I think, directly attributable to the reactions of their family members and society as a whole, not to the abuse itself. The appalled reactions they get, the lessons about how much they've been hurt, are in direct contrast with the love, however inappropriate, they may feel for their abusers and the pleasurable sexual sensations they might have felt. What can be concluded except that they are as dirty, bad, perverted and evil as their abusers?

Whynot, The straight dope 7 Comments [1/4/2018 5:12:52 PM]
Fundie Index: 4

Quote# 135744

The current mess of consent laws in the US stems from the varied success of turn of the century morality pushes. The initial arguments were geared toward protecting innocent young women from the predations of older men. Then, as now, legal solutions to social phenomena were largely prompted by prejudice and an overwhelming need to get involved in someone else's business.

There are probably 12 year olds who do want to have sex. Some of them, I'm sure, will want to or will actually have sex with older people. I don't see a problem with that situation, as long as both participants are willing. The problem comes in when coercion and force are involved. Neither coercion nor force should be tolerated in any relationship, much less a sexual one. Fortunately, pretty much all societies have both laws and social repercussions to deal with those situations. Currently, I think the US sometimes goes too far.

We now have sexual harassment laws that put a big damper on people meeting at work and starting a relationship, partly because many people view the balance of power to be problematic (possibility of coercion). I have quite a few friends whose parents would never have met under these circumstances since they met at work and even flirting is discouraged at many workplaces. We're now seeing a huge surge in social networking solutions to the problem created by it being socially unacceptable to find someone to date at work, where people spend an increasing amount of their waking hours.

My parents met when my mother was 16 and my father was 24. California law now, and then I believe, would have treated their relationship as statutory rape. My two younger sisters and I would not exist if my parents had had to deal with the same social conditions as now. Nor would another one of my friends, who is also the oldest of three, and whose father is 10 years older than his mother. My first few sexual experiences were technically illegal, since I was underage and doing it with people who were much older than I. The current attitude, that only people 18 years old or older are responsible enough to have sex, is frankly ridiculous in my opinion.

When you get into the position of legislating morality, you often get into the difficulty of judging where to draw the line. In debates about this very subject, the age of consent, you rarely see a consensus. Some people even think the age should be set higher than when they themselves first had sex. I think that it's actually much easier to figure this out on a case by case basis since the cases are self-screening. If there's a complaint, there exists a possible case of coercion or force being used. Both force and coercion are much easier to objectively determine than the age at which everyone should be able to have sex. Most rape laws would work for charging a perpetrator regardless of the age of the victim; consent laws are almost superfluous.

Sleel, The straight Dope 8 Comments [1/5/2018 9:55:06 AM]
Fundie Index: 5

Quote# 135779

Gays I know fight a lot...well most of them, and they are really noisy and dramatic about it. I think part of the problem is jealousy because many have open relationships. Emphasizing not all, but most I know fight like cats and dogs...it is entertaining for sure. S

sharaleigh23, Realabortiondebate 11 Comments [1/6/2018 8:20:39 AM]
Fundie Index: 2

Quote# 21623

please help me with a bad feeling that my family has about this new election. in revalations you can see discussions about clintin ,not for battom but please read now hillary is running and if you add up the letters of each of her names it comes up with 666 plus the fact of before war relations with powers that embedded with terrist against our christ!!

littlebit, perspectives.com 59 Comments [3/4/2007 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 2
Submitted By: Missa

Quote# 21613

When studying the Bible, there are portions which are poetic in their composition as well as those which are figurative. However, despite the poetic or figurative nature of certain passages, we still must take the literal meaning of those passages.

Bro. Randy, Teens-4-Christ 43 Comments [3/4/2007 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 6

Quote# 21592

Did you know that the only reason why virtually every scientist in the world accepts evolution? It's because they are all in on one big conspiracy to undermine creationism.

Mihilz, CARM 88 Comments [3/4/2007 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 10

Quote# 21589

By saying this you are denying the omnipotence of God......His unlimited power. God created the heaven and the earth and all that dwell therein. He chose for the chromosomes to be placed as they are within man and within monkeys. Many scientists have studied themselves out of a belief in God. They have laid aside the natural knowledge of God for the un-natural knowledge of the world and its humanistic systems. Had man continued in the knowledge of God the theory of evolution would not exist.

Mrs. Debbie, T4C 46 Comments [3/4/2007 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Missa

Quote# 21443

There are no contradictions, and thus far nothing has been provided to show otherwise. Just a few ramblings by atheists attempting to disprove a God they claim they don't believe in. Emphasis on claim because EVERYONE believes in God, atheists just choose to rebel and pretend he doesn't exist. This silly behavior would be akin to a child saying "I dont have any parents". Anyways..

Trinidad and Tobago, CARM 45 Comments [3/2/2007 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 2

Quote# 21557

I must point out that my evolutionist friend was stating that evolution disproved Genesis, hence is Genesis is disproved then the rest of the Bible is also.

I steered the debate from Genesis into the other 65 books. He was found wanting, and started that debate by denying Jesus ever existed... etc.

In a sense, how the creation has come about is not actually that interesting to me, though it makes me chuckle when people say things are scientific facts. But to suggest we have evolved from apes seems absurd.

scarlets79, CARM 28 Comments [3/3/2007 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 5

Quote# 21552

Evolution is a religion. A strange fantasy that we are nothing more than an accident that's evolved over millions of years. No meaning, no purpose, no inspiration, no spirituality, nothing. Death unavoidable. No spirituality or leader. A belief based on pseudo-science.

Who would choose this religion?

scarlets79, CARM 46 Comments [3/3/2007 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 6

Quote# 102804

It is tragic that comedian Robin Williams died today at age 63 without Christ as his Savior. There's only one place that Mr. Williams can now go to spend eternity, and that is to the Lake of Fire!!! Jesus warned that except a man be born-again by the Spirit of God, he cannot enter into the Kingdom of God (John 3:5-7). There is no evidence to believe that either Robin Williams, nor his mother who followed the demonic Christian Science religion, or Robin's father who followed the demonic Episcopalian religion, were saved at all. I fear that all three of them are sufferings in the torments of Hellfire. It makes me cry thinking about it, but it is Bible truth. The Bible says what it says. The message of the Gospel is very clear and easy to understand. It is a free gift to have eternal life.

David J. Stewart, Jesus is Savior 68 Comments [8/19/2014 3:24:22 AM]
Fundie Index: 38

Quote# 135769

Brutal blackpill: being aspie is worse than being ugly

Controversial blackpill If you are an aspie/autistic/sperg and 5-6/10 you will have a worse social and romantic life than a 3-4/10 who has good social skills. A lot of you dont want to admit this because its easy to just say "8+ or death" and just give up or "looks is everything" and although looks do play an important role being socially awkward and high inhib is a huge death sentence that no one brings up very often. The good thing is unless you are actually mentally retarded a 4-6/10 incel can immerse himself with normies and eventually become NT

shadowninya, incels.me 11 Comments [1/6/2018 3:33:08 AM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 135771

modernism and liberalism ruined us

if it wasnt for these stupid marxist ideals, we would be living in a society like it was 500-1000 year ago. Most of us wouldve been married by now arranged by our parents and we would not be alone. There would be no stacies. Every woman would be submissive and know her place.

i wish there was a way to go back in time

The ideal was 100-500 years ago. Before that was the Middle Ages which was almost as degenerate as current times (in Europe).

We will return to patriarchy or it'll be the end of humanity. This shit is not sustainable. Depressing part is we probably won't be around to see it.

Also people did not care about looks back in the day. Even the most ugliest inbred person was able to find a partner..

muricunt, fschmidt and MarcLepinePBUH, r/MaleForeverAlone 15 Comments [1/6/2018 3:33:14 AM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 135778

Question...when was Trump racist ever? Or on campaign? They state this constantly and it is so much that I think we need to stop and ask that question every time they bring it up.

Racism got worse under Obama, hatred for cops even though there are just a few bad ones, etc. Obama started out racist...remember first time with the professor? When has Trump ever been a racist. From what I remember he went up against elite in Florida fighting for inclusion of blacks and Jews when some wanted them excluded. He has always been a friend to blacks...ask al Sharpton.


sharaleigh23, Realabortiondebate 15 Comments [1/6/2018 8:20:37 AM]
Fundie Index: 3

Quote# 135781

A far-Right masked female singing group has brought discord to a formerly tranquil southern French village whose only previous claim to fame was its sparkling mineral water.

Les Brigandes perform songs that target Muslims, Jews, journalists, gays, Jesuits, freemasons, politicians and Pope Francis. The band has male backing musicians and moved into La Salvetat-sur-Agout in 2015. They live in a commune of about 30 people, according to village residents.

An online petition against the group has gathered nearly 1,500 signatures, more than the population of the village, which has only 1,100 residents. Christophe Pourprix, who launched the petition, and another villager, Thierry Canals, have started legal action against the group for allegedly threatening to assault them.

“When they sing one of their songs, I Am a Fascist, they perform a Nazi salute and appear with Kalashnikov rifles instead of guitars,” Mr Canals, 60, told The Telegraph. “They’ve opened a shop selling neo-Nazi tracts, the writings of Jean-Marie Le Pen [founder of the Front National] and Mein Kampf.”

Videos by the group, said to be well known in far-Right circles, have been viewed millions of times on YouTube.

Its female singers generally appear in short skirts and Zorro-style masks. They sometimes don fake pig’s heads to poke fun of Muslims and Jews, villagers said.

“They’re against Arabs, blacks and anyone who isn’t white,” said Mr Canals, an ex-soldier who ran a local restaurant until last year. “Another of their songs, Foutez le Camp, is supposed to be a message to minorities to leave the country.”

“Lots of visitors come to their property and we often see cars with German or Swiss number plates parked there,” Mr Canals said.

Attempts to contact Les Brigandes went unanswered. They refused to answer the questions of a reporter for Le Parisien newspaper who went to their home.

The mayor, Thibault Estadieu, has reportedly urged residents to be tolerant of the group, which has performed for free at a local retirement home and takes part in community activities. Mr Estadieu was not immediately available to comment.

Les Brigandes, The Telegraph 14 Comments [1/6/2018 10:23:58 AM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: JeanP

Quote# 135787

Net Neutrality? Good riddance.
I am not one of the crowd. I am separate and believe the Lord. I cannot stomach what the internet is used for anymore. I hope they do get rid of the so-called "freedoms" we take for granted on the wicked wide web. It may be for an evil reason, but I believe God Almighty is over this and HE will have His will done.

I actually see the internet being charged for as a good thing. Before the computer, children played outside, people talked mouth to mouth and had morals. Before the internet started becoming a god, people actually used their own brains and worked hard for a living, and weren't afraid of being spied on and under surveillance everywhere they went. Before the WWW stole dominion over society, folks were decent and had compassion on one another and didn't kill each other because they were looked at in a funny way. I tell you, this computer age needs to be shut down and put and end to, and I KNOW God will get it done in HIS timing.

With all this "neutrality" bullcrap, things have gone way over the top in the name of free speech and free expression. People will always do what others do; it's the herd mentality. If you have a Samsung Galaxy phone, then someone else will want one too. If you hate Trump, so will someone else. The computer age has become an almighty god to the sheeple of the world.

I was just reading an article about the "privileges" of a free internet. Look at what they say will be done away with if this neutrality rules ban occurs.

"The consequences will be particularly devastating for marginalized communities media outlets have misrepresented or failed to serve. People of color, the LGBTQ community, indigenous peoples and religious minorities in the United States rely on the open internet to organize, access economic and educational opportunities, and fight back against systemic discrimination."

I say, GOOD RIDDANCE!! These people are destined for defeat anyway, whether it be now or at the judgment. GOD will have the final word in all matters.

Why do they say, "people of color"? Why not just come out and say "blacks"? The LGBTQ community? They're already damned and headed for the Lake of Fire if they don't repent. The sheeple use the internet as a means to riot and protest everything their whiny little hearts don't like! Ungrateful, Christ-hating morons!! I say, bring it! Thank you, Verizon, AT&T and all those other Satanic companies! The Lord can and does use evil to bring good! God is still on His throne. America is past overdue for a good spanking, and I believe this will do the trick!! Yes Sir!!

Silent Witness aka kingjameswriter1965, Dying to the Flesh, Living for the Lord Site 7 20 Comments [1/6/2018 12:35:42 PM]
Fundie Index: 8

Quote# 135452

The reason why many people and families stop coming to church is because they feel unwanted. I attended a local Baptist church one time on Guam, back in 2009. My life was in shambles, devastated after a divorce I didn't want in 2006. My life is still in shambles, and I am often lonely. I am looking for a wife, and praying, and in the Lord's time I hope to remarry. I remember sitting in back of the church and often crying during the congregational singing and special music, with a broken heart. I have always been a quiet person, keeping to myself, which is my personality (which is why it is hard for me to find a wife). No one reached out to me. The church uses the modern Bibles. They have since officially removed the name “Baptist” from their church. But when I was visiting faithfully for two months in 2009, no one befriended me. I remember the senior pastor saying one day from the pulpit, “Some of you are like big teenagers, you expect us to come up to you and befriend you, but you need to open up and talk to us.” I couldn't believe that he said that. It was a short time afterwards that I left and never went back, not because I was disgruntled, but because I simply didn't feel like anyone cared, that no one loved me there, and I felt like a misfit. I was hurting and at the bottom of life.

You know, that senior pastor is a graduate of Dallas Theological Seminary. He also has a degree in psychology, go figure. And yet he, and I say this kindly, was so shallow that he couldn't even reach out to someone with a broken heart who was a loner. I am indeed like a big teenager, and I admit it, and there's nothing wrong with that. That's why I often wear my cap backwards (or maybe my head is on backwards...lol). I still feel like I'm 15 years old in my heart, and I like that. Brother Hyles teaches in his books that we ought to be a child, adolescent, adult.

David J. Stewart, Jesus is Savior 17 Comments [12/23/2017 1:32:43 PM]
Fundie Index: 1

Quote# 126340

Pope Francis: who am I to judge?

More on this fundie:

Emily Thomes, Facebook (mirrored at ChristianForums.com) 17 Comments [4/15/2017 11:24:09 AM]
Fundie Index: 7
1 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 20 25 30 35 40 | top