paraphilias-are-human #fundie paraphilias-are-human.tumblr.com

so...i have a question. To put it simply, i'm a zoophile. The thing is.. I'm not anti contact. Well, in some cases i suppose but, generally, I think that with animals, they CAN consent. Not verbally of course, but they can eagerly obviously want sex. If a dog is violently humping at somebodies leg, why is it so wrong to give the dog a quick hand (literally). Especially if it makes the human and dog feel good. I dont know? i can’t even really say im non offending, honestly, as i’ve tried something with my dog before when in heat. I also frequently watch zoophilia porn (Watching and participating in bestiality is completely legal where i live, if that helps at all). I just wanna know your thoughts. Am i inherently a bad person? am i the exception, to all this positivity? I don’t want to be a bad person but I genuinely think in some cases, its fine to pleasure animals if they obviously want it.


I understand your concern. First of all, I want to make clear that no one is inherently a bad person. The world is not black and white, things are more complex than that. I don’t think you are a bad person (and less when you are even worried of being doing something wrong, that shows that you care, which is really important).
The short answer is that I agree with you. I just don’t like to post things that are clearly controversial in a very vocal and explicit way because this is not a blog where I discuss my opinions (not like my main) but just a blog for positivity. When I talk about zoophiles I talk about the ones who ‘don’t harm animals’. I’m totally against animal abuse and zoosadism (zoosadism in the sense of actions, fantasies are ok). If the animal suffers some kind of harm, pain or distress, I find that as abuse and I’m against it. But I also thing animals can consent, in the sense of being obvious when they want some kind of sexual interaction or when they are feeling uncomfortable and want you to stop. Also, some animals are specially anthropophilic, so— If you don’t harm and animal, you respect their limits and are really careful, I don’t see it as abuse.
That is why I’m not expecific with my zoo positivity posts. I don’t think all kind of sexual contact with animals is abusive, so if you don’t harm them, you are ok and not an exception for my positivity. Some people will disagree, I guess, but that is on them. For me, if you don’t hurt animals, you are ok.
However, I’d be careful about the porn. Mostly because you can’t know if that animal really wanted it, if they are being treated well or if they suffer any kind of abuse. Sometimes it can seem obvious, but how could you know? I have heard that in child porn the kids seem to be ok with it— I think when it is about porn you should be really careful because you can’t know what is happening behind the cameras (no need to say that all actual child porn is bad and abusive, I guess, I just mentioned it as an example).
[..]
So tl;dr: you are ok if you aren’t hurting animals and you deserve positivity. Be careful with porn, not because the law, but because the abuse it could be happening, and understand what I mean in my posts with “zoophiles who don’t harm animals”.
Hope you have a nice day :)
anon asks answer zoophilia discussion not positivity controversial opinions i love how this is the 'short answer' dont want to imagine the long one lol xD about me personal opinions about the blog

16 comments

Confused?

So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!

To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register. Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.