OmegaKV #sexist incelocalypse.ru

Women's attraction is relative, not absolute

Just watched this video by FaceAndLMS and was kind of disappointed at how he handled the question, although he is not complemlty wrong:

https://youtube.com/watch?v=RIf5RrnPj5Y

I unfortunately can't type much because there is a 5 second lag between when I type and when the characters show up, but basically I just want to say this: Imagine if the planet was filled with Chads and only guys above 8/10 existed but there is still a 1:1 male/female ratio.

Do you think every guy will get laid? If absolute attractiveness matters then every man will get laid. But no, RELATIVE looks are what matter. What will happen is that the Chaddiest 10/10 Chads will get laid and the regular 8/10 Chads will be incel.

Some guy makes a point that women's perception of looks are biological rather than learned from her environment, and I agree, but that is something completely different! He is confusing nature vs nurture with relative vs absolute. Women have an innate method of ranking men's looks, but it will always be the BEST men that turn women on, because in a competitive environment being the best is what matters for evolutionary success.

The typing lag on this website (and all websites that use the lookism.net forum software) is extremely painful. I just spent 6 or 7 minutes waiting for the last sentence to finish typing.

7 comments

Confused?

So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!

To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register. Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.