Quote# 140317

Mate, I fully understand being attracted to minors, until itdoesn't surpass the boundaries of 2d world, but giving advice on 'meeting' irl lolis or actually doing that is not okay in my opinion. Hope you understand my point.

You’re entitled to your opinion. Of course I comprehend your point, because yours is the opinion of the vast majority of society. You think I haven’t heard that before? Yours is a voice lost in a near-infinite sea of society which claims I’m wrong, evil, even foolish.

Where we differ is in our interpretation of the objective morality—the metaphysical truth that exists outside human consciousness. The pertinent objective morality is this: It’s wrong to sexually abuse young people. You interpret the moral line of abuse as “meeting or actually doing that.” Well, to me, that’s patently vague. My idea of the moral line is “coercing a young person into behavior which could hurt them physically or emotionally now or in the future.” 

Of course, I can’t guarantee that a person I advise won’t abuse someone by the standard I defined above. Nor can your state guarantee that you won’t kill a vanload of people when you drive your car. But like your driving instructor, I can provide guidelines, moral and technical training, and only give licensure (the keys to attracting lolis, if you will) to those I deem deserving. I only advise individuals whom I’ve vetted. And in this way, I make the world a little bit safer for lolis.

– Jax

Lil-loli-playhouse4, Tumblr 5 Comments [9/7/2018 2:02:53 PM]
Fundie Index: 6

Username  (Login)
Comment  (Text formatting help) 

1 | bottom



You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.

9/17/2018 1:38:06 PM


Jimmy Savile drove a Rolls-Royce. Carroll Shelby built, tuned & drove cars.

One driver's subjective recklessness in driving AC Cobras at 180+ MPH on the M1 in Britain.

The other was the worst paedophile in British history.

One of the above's actions ultimately resulted in legislation which saved millions of lives here: including children then, therefore generations since the 1960s. Despite a TV campaign promoting seatbelt use, the other damaged children's lives: too many to count.

One is highly respected: even after his death. The other became so reviled, not even his grave in Scarborough exists.

By our vetting, we have made the world safer for children from the likes of you.

By our voting for our MPs, they recently made anti-paedophile laws tougher. Good.

9/17/2018 3:39:22 PM


I hate to put up myself as some sort of moral beacon, but, I'll just go out on a limb here and say...well...if you're an adult, it probably ain't a good idea to fuck kids, okay?

I mean, I ain't gonna tell you that if you're say, 20, to not get into a relationship with a 17-yo for example. But, we gotta have SOME standards, right?

I'll even go on to say, I ain't gonna damn somebody for having pedo fantasies and/or having the hots for an underage girl.

Just, ya know...keep it in your pants, OK?

9/17/2018 9:23:18 PM


Referring to real-life little girls as lolis is bad enough. But giving people advice on how to pick up children and justifying it with pretentious nonsense about subjective morality is a whole new low.

If you like anime lolis, fine. Hell, I like anime lolis. But that stuff MUST REMAIN IN THE REALM OF FICTIONAL FANTASY. Some people have rape fantasies and that doesn’t mean they approve of rape in real life. Some people fantasize about eating people whole, but do they go out and become cannibals in real life? No.

12/5/2018 2:42:59 PM


Perhaps if the vast majority of society has the same opinion, that opinion has quite a bit of weight and reason behind it...

If there exist an objective morality, it ought to be "Don't harm others or infringe on their civil rights".
Sexually abusing young people is to coerce them in to any kind of sexual behavior or action.

If you can interpret it like that, it's not objective morality.

No, you're making the world a little bit easier for child-molesters.

12/6/2018 7:52:34 AM

1 | top: comments page