Kidult feminists who insist on playing sex in the city don't have a "right" to destroy human life rather than endure nine months of "inconvenience." And stop with the fake concern for victims of rape and incest.
27 comments
Wow. Everything Jan LaRue doesn't like all rolled up into one imaginary kind of 'kidult' person. Feminists, the evil tech industry, Congress and SCOTUS, secularists, the people behind sex-ed, pedophiles, pornographers and porn customers, people who have abortions, gays, polygamists, people who swear, people who want uncensored child swearing... and, apparently, other people who decry sexual abuse.
W T F ?
Whoa! Whoa! Let's get that temper under control, okay psycho?
Kidult? Do you think that's funny or cute, cause it's neither.
Oh, yah, one last thing.......fucking cunt.
"Kidult"?
And stop with the fake concern for victims of rape and incest.
I have a hell of a lot more concern for them than I ever will for you.
The first sentence was distinctly fundie.
The second sentence was off-the-scale, mindless-hate-spewing, bat-guano-insane fundie.
My car should accelerate so fast; I'd have trouble keeping it under Mach 2.
~David D.G.
Oh, hell, another guanophrenic fundie.
Obviously, CWFA is the serious version of Ladies Against Women.
Yes, I only use rape and incest victims as an excuse because I get pregnant all the time and really just want to get all the abortions for myself so that I can still fit into my cute clothes and not have to worry about taking care of a baby instead of going out and having all that promiscuous unprotected sex.
Whatever.
Is that you? Damn, you were much more fun when you were still called "Danny".
Pregnancy is not a motherfucking punishment for "sin" you STUPID BITCH!
We know you have no concern for victims of rape and incest, but it's probably a good time to point out to you that not everyone is a biblebashing fundie, and some of us actually care about other people - even women! (GASP!)
Kidult feminists who insist on playing sex in the city don't have a "right" to destroy human life rather than endure nine months of "inconvenience."
No, but they do have a right to control their own bodies. If you want to suffer the side effects of pregnancy, endure the pain of childbirth, and spend as many as 20 years and and maybe $200,000 raising a child you never really wanted, then fine. If you intend to put the child up for adoption, not fine; it's quite selfish to have a child you don't want, only to force others to care for him/her solely so you can uphold some silly principle; you'd be hurting the child to save the embryo. If someone else would rather get an abortion than go through pregnancy, birth, caring for an infant, caring for a child, living with a teen, and paying for said teen's college education, then fine. You have no right to interfere.
And stop with the fake concern for victims of rape and incest.
Fake concern for rape victims?
From dictionary.com or something
red herring
1. a smoked herring.
2. something intended to divert attention from the real problem or matter at hand, such as claiming that your opponents don't care about rape victims when trying to argue against abortion, in an attempt to distract people from the fact that banning abortion causes great harm to rape victims.
Look, Ms. LaRue. You want to ban abortion. This could ruin the lives of rape victims raising a child consumes a lot of time and money, and she'll be forced to look at the likeness of her rapist every day. This is a very pressing question that you need to answer, and it won't go away by randomly claiming that I'm really a monster who doesn't care about it.
Just because you don't feel it doesn't mean that I'm faking it.
I sort of wonder what good it is to comment on it on the internet, though.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.