How easily you display your belief in IMAGINARY numbers, but yet pretend that a VERY REAL God is mythology.
34 comments
WTF? Are there two Crosises or does the one Crosis have MPD or something? *confused*
Oh right, the comment. Nutrider99 (what kind of name is that anyway) is either 13 and hasn't learned this kind of math or is older and declined the opportunity to do so.
It sounds like Nutrider is a product of the A Beka math homeschool curriculum.
(Actually, I'm not sure about A Beka's policy on imaginary numbers; but given their doctrinal opposition to set theory ? Yeah. That there's some grade-A batshit.)
Would Nutrider care to compare and contrast the Laplace Transformnation and the Fourrier Transform, paying particular attention as to the areas of validity of each?
How about a comment on tensors?
Let's be Boolean for a moment - I expect he believes that the empty set, Ø, is not actually empty but has god living in it...
@Qubit: Uh, no it doesn't. Imaginary means non-real. They are a subset of complex numbers, quaternions, octonions and sedenions, though.
Numbers are representive of reality (it's not just the number six, it's six apples or whatever)
God is representive of ancient people without the sciences in place to recognize reality ( plus a lot of control the masses and women tossed in)
"How easily you display your belief in IMAGINARY numbers , but yet pretend that a VERY REAL God is mythology."
(at almost empty GOP meeting):
image
Nutbagrider(IQ)9.9: 'Thirty-ten, twenty-teen, sixty-leven, feventy-noon...!'
SpukiKitty: 'What's he doing?!'
Me: 'Oh, him? He's just here to make up the numbers. ' X3
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.