I can prove homosexual sex is a sin.
1) Any extra marital sex is a sin.
2) marriage is only between a man and a woman
3) ergo there is no such thing as a gay marriage
4) So without marriage all homosexual sex becomes extramarital.
5) ergo homosexual sex is a sin.]
Thank you Lord for giving him the wisdom to put it in this way....now no matter what anyone says, they can't twist your truth anymore without admitting there's sin involved....Lord you know I was getting so sick of the denial of Your Word, but there's no denying what You just said thru this brother. Thank You Jesus
31 comments
Hmmm....time for a throwback to logic class...
1) A=B
2) M=M iff m+w
3) Therefore, m+m =/= M
4) So m+m=A
5) Ergo, A=B
Sure, the foundations of your entire argument, 1 and 2...they're inherently corrent, neh? NOT.
Isn't logic fun? ^^
Well, mainly because Abraham took Agar as Concubine, Jacob took 2, and they went to see prostitutes when they were in Babylon. Honestly, I think that they didn´t take marriage very seriously.
Gee, I was starting to get really worried about all the sin in the world and god's wrath and then I remembered something, I don't believe in god, or heaven, or hell.
Funny, couldn't care less about 'sin' now.
And I can prove your an idiot!
1) You believe posting on a forum is going to convince any one of your point of view.
See that? I only needed one point, while you needed five. This just proves your slipping, as you should be able to just say "GODDIDIT" and win any argument!
And the really fun thing is that you and yours refuse to make any concessions for homosexuals to live out of sin, thus justifying an irrational hatred as simply trying to ward off sin, even if it's for a completely arbitrary reason.
Something to be extramarital, there should be a marriage in the first place, because it's OUT OF A MARRIAGE, that is, a stablished one. You see, that's when happens when you play with semantics.
"1) Any extra marital sex is a sin."
False premise. There is no such thing as sin.
"2) marriage is only between a man and a woman"
False premise. Marriage was hijacked by the church in about 900 AD. It has always been a means to pass wealth through families, usually via the male in most cultures.
"3) ergo there is no such thing as a gay marriage"
Invalid conclusion based on faulty premises. Just admit you're pro-gay promiscuity. You outlaw them from uniting so you can belittle them.
"4) So without marriage all homosexual sex becomes extramarital."
Redundancy alert! Round circles are round!
"5) ergo homosexual sex is a sin"
Poor conclusion based on a faulty premise.
1- Any extra marital sex is a sin
2- Marriage is between Josh and Michelle Buggar
3- Ashley Madison. Also, Josh paying a porn star for rough sex: while poor wifey was pregnant with their fourth child
4- 26th June SCOTUS decision: 2015
5- Two years later: Roy Less
6- ?????
7- The Religious Reich are destroyed. Ergo, their - and your - whole concept of 'Sin' has no right to exist. Also, your 'God' & Mary.
Your 'God' doesn't exist. Q. E. and fucking D.
So, you think it's Time 4 a Change, to make marriage be between two consenting adults, regardless of gender? GREAT!
Besides, sin is an arbitrary concept, only valid for those who believe in a certain deity.
Or do you follow all the rules against sinning in Judaism and Islam and Hindu too?
No? Well then...
Divorce is also a sin, as is remarriage. Ergo, the Drumpf has been sinning with his last two "wives", for decades.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.