“There's this guy who has NOTHING BETTER TO DO with his life than to peruse the Christian message boards on the internet, and lift quotes from people out of context and paste them on his site in a poor attempt to make us look stupid and ignorant.”
Betcha can’t diagram that sentence.
I mean, is this an attempt to show that you’re NOT stupid? That you can communicate ideas in a clear manner? That you’re posts are NOT fodder for ridicule and dismissive rejection? ’Cause you’re failing, if it is.
Also, we post THE CONTEXT of where the quotes are found. If there’s a different meaning to be found by reading the context, then please feel free to show it.
“On R.R., We've turned his silly game around: We consider it an honor to be posted on his site because much of what he's putting up there is actually FURTHERING THE GOSPEL OF CHRIST!”
Another grammar winner.
So, Dan Quayle fucked up a few times and the whole nation laughed at him. He said, “I wear their scorn with pride.” Nothing wrong with pride but it did not change the fact he could not pluralize ‘potato,’ and he got schooled by a schoolgirl.
You wanna say you’ve somehow ‘won’ something by being quoted here, that’s your self-image. Doesn’t make your arguments, facts, or sentences any less stupid, though.
"I mean hey, why have your quotes about Jesus and the sin in the world on only one web page when you can get it on two??”
Don’t remember too many cases where a post here got someone to rethink their position on your god, creationism, the Flood, homosexuality, transgenders, basic math, the meaning of words, or whether or not Christains are the proudest idiots on the planet.
