It is an excuse for those trying to justify their self-given freedom from moral obligations.
What freedom from moral obligations? Are you labouring under the misapprehension that there are roving gangs of atheists going about looting and pillaging? I'm fairly certain that, if you looked at the homes of people in prison, you'd see far more Bibles than Dawkins on their bookshelves. (Mint-condition Bibles with undamaged spines, no less.)
It is a cathalyst of individualism, drug-dependency and the survival of the (criminally) fittest.
First off: O NOES! INDIVIDUALISM! Ruuuuuun!
Secondly: This might be true, if I knew what the Hell a 'cathalyst' was. A Catholic CATALYST, perhaps?
Thirdly: "Criminally fittest"? What the fuck does that even mean? One would assume that the 'fittest' criminals would be the ones who leave nothing to incriminate themselves, and therefore would be impossible to identify as criminal in the first place.
It makes people bastardize their heritage and become vulnerable --- example, the continent of Europe has been sold to Islam and crimes by its atheistic, and therefore greedily corrupt leaders. Now Europeans are in perpetual fear of Islamic domination.
First off, Islam isn't an entity and can't make purchases. Second, nobody owned Europe, so no sale could be made. Third, I don't believe anyone could afford an entire continent. Fourth, Europe's leaders tend to be religious, or at least feign such for purposes of getting elected. Fifth, If Europe has already been sold to Islam, why would Europeans be "in perpetual fear of Islamic domination"? It'd be like living in fear of the 2009 World Series- one tends not to be afraid of what has already happened. You've shot down your own argument, tool.