Feynman and Coulter's Love Child #sexist

Feynman and Coulter's Love Child #sexist 3edgesword.blogspot.com

[From "Incels are national heros for not raping the bitches who reject them"]

Twitch has changed it's terms to no longer let people use "incel" as an insult.

It's ridiculous Big Tech censorship, of course. But there was always something interesting about people who insulted people by calling them an "incel".

"Incel" as an insult basically means "you should go rape instead".

The term "incel" of course means "involuntary celibate". The person isn't having sex not through a personal choice, but because he (and let's be honest, it's almost always a he) can't find a willing (female) partner.

So then somebody on the internet calling an incel an incel as an insult (say that three times fast) is essentially telling him that he should stop being an incel. He would do this by, presumably, having sex with a woman.

However "having sex with a woman" is what the incel has been trying to do. But no women want to do it with him. So the command "go have sex" is essentially "go rape a chick".

Like all Big Tech censors, Twitch shouldn't be in the business of restricting any words: from "incel" to "nigger" everything should be permitted, but it's also one that the pansy leftists who use the term probably should have shied away from in the first place.

16 comments

Why am I not surprised that you are a fan of incels?

And no, just not doing selfish evil to people who are “asking for it” is far from sufficient for heroism. Especially since it’s pretty clear most incels don’t commit the crimes they fantasise about purely out of cowardice and laziness.

@Bastethotep #71349

Well, expecting a reward for refraining from evil makes some sense when you think the natural inclination of humans (and anything else that isn’t God) is slaughter, rapine, and all other sadisms...

Aileen Wuornos wishes to you, whingecel maggot, you won’t be an incel in prison.

The difference being that being an incel is a choice (even if they claim it’s not) and most other denominations of minority’s are not. I would want that people could be called out for stuff they choose but not stuff they are born with

Like all Big Tech censors, Twitch shouldn't be in the business of restricting any words: from "incel" to "nigger" everything should be permitted, but it's also one that the pansy leftists who use the term probably should have shied away from in the first place

Seems to me that it's not just others that have been 'censored' in this way.

Or are you one of those manbabies too, FAILman & Cunter's Hate Child...?!

See? I've used a worse one.

The term "incel" of course means "involuntary celibate"

No. The term "incel" means "whiny delusional misogynistic misanthropic loser who's probably also a Nazi".

No, if we tell an incel to stop being an incel, we are not telling them to get laid by any mmeans necessary including rape. incels already beleieve that anyways, and having would not cure an incel because their problem is not their virginity, it is their mindset, attitudes belief system. If anything, “ascension” seems to only accelerate the downwards spiral since, surprise surprise, losing their virginity doesn’t magically fix their problems (and, given how over-invested in their first time they are, will inevitably be disappointing no matter how good the sex is).
No, we are admonishing them to change their ways and overcome the misogyny, psychopathy and aggrieved entitlement that turns involuntary celebacy in a self-fulfilling prophecy.

@Bastethotep #71386

Now that you speak of it, how willing do you think the archetypal incel will be to believe that if one’s first time doesn’t involve a good deal of mutual laughter, it’s being done wrong? (Disclaimer: 43 years old, chaste, and not terribly bothered by that, so working with idealism and extrapolation here.)

Yet more hate from Feynman and Coulter's ~~Love~~Hateful Child.

@Skyknight #71387

From most of the incel quotes we get (which I’ll admit still aren’t the majority of incels.co) I’d say actually that the most vocal ones seem to think there should be screaming on the woman’s part.

@Skyknight #71387
Zero. Performance anxiety is a major theme with incels - of course in a very egocentric way that is all about the incel’s own feelings of inadequacy rather than his hypothetical partner having a bad time, and further amplified and warped by many of the falsehoods they believe, such as “hypergamy” and “A Real Man™‌ is not a virgin”- and serves as one of the main rationales for “If you didn’t [romantic/sexual milestone] before [age], IT’S OVER!” and as for why they deserve a teenage virgin who is completely ignorant of all sexual matters.

Incels claiming that male feminists are masochistically loyal to an ideology that does nothing but exploit and abuse them while laughing at them is projection. In truth, incels are the “bluepilled cucks”, the wilfully ignorant losers who fanatically support machismo even though it only hurts them.

it's also one that the pansy leftists who use the term probably should have shied away from in the first place.

We use this term because it’s what you assholes call yourselves! Either you are trying to manipulate for sympathy because that’s the only way you understand anything or you have forgotten that or both.

@Bastethotep #71395

Note that I meant it ought to involve mutual laughter whether or not everything went according to plan. As in, if the incel does what he thinks he ought to have done, and he and his partner still aren’t laughing with mutual delight, lightheartedness, etc., is it really complete?

And that’s before considering whether it’s a good idea to take oneself so seriously during sex in the first place. Truly, the participants are in a state of mutual full vulnerability (and maybe I’ve just hit on what’s actually revulsing potential bedmates from incels on sight—they can tell how unforthcoming they’re going to be.); gravity should not be on the menu. Not in foreplay, not in intercourse, not in afterplay. (I wait to hear of couples with whom giggling and/or laughter are consistent foreplay/afterplay ingredients. Even after decades.)

I’ve heard two right wing Youtubers (Aydin Paladin and TL;DR) try to argue that an incel is simply someone who is unable to find a sexual partner but would like to, and that to mock someone for that is cruel. And I agree, if that is how you define someone as an incel, then yes, it is cruel to mock incels. But we don’t define incels that way. First off, “incel” is a term created by the incels themselves, so it’s not like we’re applying it to otherwise good people. More importantly, we aren’t criticizing people who are unable to find romantic partners. We criticize the toxic, delusional worldview of the people who think their inability to have a relationship with a submissive, attractive woman is part of a massive conspiracy by “foids” who want to be part of Chad’s harem.

Doesn't the fact that incel rapidly became an insult completely removed from context indicate that it's original definition didn't strike people as all that meaningful?

I’d give these conservative dumbasses one bit of ground if they’d recognize the one thing we’ve notice. I’d stop talking about the damn incels and actually just call them blackpillers if and only if these people would admit the blackpillers exist, instead of always trying to turn the argument into how we’re “unfairly insulting someone who just hasn’t had sex”. I admit, this is how the incel term started, just a bunch of people who haven’t had sex in a long time. Hell, it would also help if these dumbasses would admit it’s not just virgins, but people who just haven’t had a partner in years! But they want to lock onto the virgin part!

In short, fuck all these assholes. Their every word proves their uselessness, and until they can acknowledge at least the basic fact that blackpillers exist and have taken over the incel label by being the loudest most obnoxious little pricks they can be, I’ll keep calling all these “blackpill” shitheads incels, and mean it in the nastiest way possible.