problem is that Evolutionary theory is "junk science", as there have little essential LITTLE evidence to support that on a true science basis, as there have been NO evidence for transistion species in fossil record, NO proof to origins of life apart from God, and NO biological evidence to support notion that God did NOT breate all things after own kind as in genesisi account!
To holfd to that, would be puttingscince ahead of revealed word of God, to negate real scientic evidene that suppts full creationism,and to viewgenesis in either a myte or allogorical way!
50 comments
I would have liked to have commented, but Jeebus! Close to illiterate.
Tell you what, Yeshua, I can supply you with the locations of a number of adult literacy programs, and I really think you should take me up on this.
Oky, youhv covinecd me, eovlutoin isn't true, ceratinonism is ture! I blevie in god nwo and am goigng to hvaen!
Please define "true science basis", or on the other hand, please don't.
There might not be evidence for "transistion species" but there are transitional fossils.
Origins of life is not a part of ToE and there is no credible evidence for God even existing let alone magically creating life.
If your assumption is that magic man who can do anything has done it in a way that can't be known then it is really amazing that no one hasn't been able to find evidence against that.
"puttingscince ahead of revealed word of God", I would say putting observable phenomena ahead stories told by men.
There might be "scientic evidene that suppts full creationism" but there isn't scientific evidence for creationism.
"there have been NO evidence for transistion species in fossil record"
"NO proof to origins of life"
"NO biological evidence to support notion that God did NOT breate all things"
Your brain is in back to front, it's a squeaky styrofoam model, it was probably picked-up cheap from a second-rate back-street brain forger, it has no logic circuitry, and you think that evolutionary theory is "junk science" is a problem?.
@Rob aka Mediancat
"Myth," but he meant, "mythical."
@ OP:
All species are transitional. Now go waiot in the corner until your headsplodes.
NO evidence for transistion species in fossil record
I could post the pictures of the transitions for whales, horses, and even humans for the hundredth time. I could post Tiktaalik for the hundredth time. But honestly, If people STILL believe that there are no transitional fossils then where not dealing with people that are in any way anchored to reality and thus presenting evidence is moot. Either they can't understand it or they refuse to understand it. Either way, it's pointless to try.
Is that English? Your grasp of the language is almost as bad as your grasp of the ToE.
There is more evidence for the ToE than there is for the Theory of Gravity. We have literally thousands of museums filled with evidence and transitional species. You're a transitional species, Yeshua. Evolution doesn't concern itself with the origin of life, just the diversity and adaptation, through random mutations and natural selection.
Genesis and creationism are myths or allegories, science is science.
"problem is that Evolutionary theory is "junk science"
image
Suigintou, who was created by Rozen, would regard you & your 'Cre(a)ti(o)nism' as Junk.
Certainly your illiteracy, but that's par for the course with educationally inferior fundies such as you .
"essential LITTLE evidence to support that on a true science basis, as there have been NO evidence for transistion species in fossil record,"
We have the transitional fossils. We win.
image
a true science basis
image
Silly creationist, scientists are already using the theory of evolution in their machines, behold the many stages of the devil gundam!
Stage 1:image
Stage after the thing eats a space colony:image
Final form:image
Evolution superior Creationism inferior
NO biological evidence to support notion that God did NOT breate all things after own kind as in genesisi account!
There's no proof that God didn't create the universe last Thursday, either.
"as there have been NO evidence for transistion species in fossil record"
You mean, other than the existence of multiple fine grained transitional fossil series themselves, such as the 139 fine-grained species to species transitional sequences documented in "Roger J. Cuffey. 1972. Paleontologic evidence and organic creation. Journal of the American Scientific Affiliation"?
When it comes to people like this there is no use in pointing to any transitional species because if you do all you are creating is two holes that they demand is filled by other transitional species, and so it goes on ad nauseum.
I think they call it Gish's Law or something like that.
This is like watching a rerun of a very bad TV show for the millionth time. It was crap the first time, it's still crap now, and it will remain crap long after humankind vanishes off the face of this planet.
problem is that intellijent desin creashun theory is "junk science", as there have LITTLE evidence to support that on a true science basis, as there have been NO evidence for intellijent desin, NO proof of God, and NO evidence to support that God created all things as in genesisi account!
To holfd to intellijent desin, would be putting creashun myte ahead of scince!
Fixed.
Learn to spell, then people shall listen.
Then they'll tell you to learn to research that which you know nothing about, as opposed to coming up with your (very bad) best guess.
"NO evidence for transistion species in fossil record" image
Archaeopteryx says hi.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
