Do not allow a sorceress/witch to live?
up vote
17
down vote
favorite
3
I saw a witch a while back being mistreated, which deeply troubled me. I am strong proponent for Luke 6:31.
I am familiar with Exodus 22:18 which usually translates to something like: Do not allow a sorceress/witch to live.
This brings to mind one main question:
Is there anything in the Bible suggesting a better way to interpret this? Are Christians expected to commit murder? I understand innumerable witches have been murdered over the millennia but this is just not acceptable to me. The society I live in deems this illegal as well.
Then I have two sub-questions:
Is there a biblical difference between witches and sorceresses? I know there are witches out there but I have not met a sorceress.
In the Bible is the word sorceress truly gender specific? e.g. male sorcerers are exempted from this?
I am trying to reconcile this with other portions of the Bible that denounce the mistreatment of others.
Answers that cite more clear and easily understandable Bible passages will get preferential treatment for approval. The sub-questions are optional but will count towards approval should all other elements of the answer be deemed equal.
mosaic-law bible-translation exodus ethics witchcraft
shareimprove this question
edited Aug 30 '15 at 2:45
ThaddeusB
4,77232150
asked Sep 2 '11 at 13:29
Jenny Thomson
6241613
2
"I saw a witch a while back being mistreated". Could you be a little more specific? DJClayworth Sep 2 '11 at 13:32
2
"Are Christians expected to commit murder?" See this question for why this would not be considered murder. However, I still think this is an excellent question. I will answer it later when I have more time if it hasn't already been answered. Flimzy Sep 2 '11 at 13:37
2
@DJClayworth She was being bullied, shoved, and ridiculed. One of the perps was yelling at her in a derogatory manner about being a witch. Jenny Thomson Sep 2 '11 at 13:46
7
@Jenny Any reason to think the people doing this were using the Bible as justification? DJClayworth Sep 2 '11 at 13:48
3
Well, I am really looking for insight on how I should live my life. The beliefs of the aggressors here are irrelevant to me (other than their behavior was horrifying). I live in a western country and am thankful our legal system is encouraged to look at this the same way and not treat offenders differently based on their beliefs. (note: I said "encouraged" and not something more definite). Jenny Thomson Sep 2 '11 at 14:00
show 2 more comments
6 Answers
active oldest votes
up vote
2
down vote
Under the old testament law then that is what God commanded, yes; but Christ is the fulfillment of the law. The law was a tutor to bring us to christ. The law is not so much finished as fulfilled. When the pharisees brought a woman caught in adultery to jesus. He said .... "fine, stone her then, in accordance with the law just let one who has committed no sin throw the first stone". Christ teaches that while technically all sin should be punished yet there is no one worthy of wielding the whip but a sinless one ..... and that single sinless one ( jesus ) doesnt condem us, and so we are in a new revelation, a new testament, the church age, the age of grace, not under condemnation. There will come a day when every bit of evil will be punished, when the lord returns with a sword but meanwhile, no, he doesnt expect us ( or even allow us ) to exact punishment on the breaking of old testament laws which were for a previous generation. Read the book of romans for more information on this particularly chapters 6 to 8. This is a HUGE subject requiring a lot of study to understand, in essence it is a large part of the core of the gospel, but it does make an awful lot of sense and in retrospect it's actually quite simple, just that we are conditioned in this world to sin righteousness, judgement and the like and not to grace, which is an entirely different animal.
shareimprove this answer
answered Sep 2 '11 at 13:53
byronyasgur
26818
add a comment
up vote
14
down vote
The commands God gave to Ancient Israel are normally divided into three kinds: moral, civil and ceremonial. This question and this question have more information. This one, and any of the others invoking the death penalty, certainly fall into the 'civil' category. The state of Israel (loosely speaking) would have the authority to impose the death penalty for a variety of offences, as many states do now.
Christians are no longer expected to obey "the law", which includes this kind of law, though most would say that they are expected to follow the 'moral laws', of which this is not one. That's not to say that 'witchcraft' is now OK,and God approves of it, but the authority to punish with a specific penalty doesn't apply to Christians in these times.
Because 'the state' is given power to punish an offence that does not give a random mob of people the right to harass someone.