I was being humorous. But seriously, aren't we fed up with this nonsense? It's time for American forces to move in and crush the freedom haters.

damn gay people taking over the world we must stop them i say we bomb canada to start

I gotta go to worl right now--But I will tell you this--I've sat through services where ppl'z limbs have grown back supernaturally. It's awesome!!

The general public is stupid and should be ignored. Think about how many lives would be saved by putting an end to this resistance. Think about how many civilians are being killed by these monsters.

They are holed up around a mosque considered on of 'holiest sites' of the Shiites. The solution? Destroy it. But this might cause the shiite majority in Iraq to rebel against the coalition... Our job is to destroy the enemy threat while minimizing U.S. casualties, not Iraqi casualties. If this incites more people to rebel then more people will get killed, it's as simple as that. But then other towns might be outraged! Then we blow up their mosques too. And finally we just govern from the sky and from our Navy fleet. Any 'problematic' areas should be dismembered through cruise missiles and airstrikes. The objective in war is to eliminate your enemies capacity to wage war. You must break their spirit, their will to fight, you must make them realize that resistance leads only to mass death and suffering.

Time to end the resistance in Najaf... Let's test out those small nukes we've been working on.

I hope we drop a nuke in fallujah and get it over with.

The general public is stupid and should be ignored. Think about how many lives would be saved by putting an end to this resistance. Think about how many civilians are being killed by these monsters.

Secdonly, what about this so called nonsense I talked about people being born as 'inanmiate objects.' Ok Shadow Fox, I'll come back to the 21st century.This clone is still an inanmiate object, because the clone was still not born through intercourse.

Actually, the cosmic background radiation was what I had in mind when I meant that the big bang could be used for proof of creation. And God said, 'Let there be light,' and there was light. -Genesis... Now, if God did indeed create light, at the furthest reaches of the universe, we should expect to see light. And what do we find? Electromagnetic radiation, of which light is a part of. Also, solar light is composed of other electromagnetic spectrum, such as ultraviolet, infrared, etc.

Part of Christianity is that God is greater than any scientific crap that man can come up with. Thus, if I were using faith as support, I could instantly invalidate every scientific argument you had. Note how this discussion will NEVER GO ANYWHERE.

How would it feel to be an Ancient Greek, expect to go to Elysium and hang out with Apollo, and end up with some foreign god (Jehovah)? Granted, hell wouldn't be what they expect either, but hey, what can a deity do?

And yes, Christianity's faith totally rapes science.

But don't you patronize me. I dont know you, nor do you. U really dont want me to fight you in RL, seriously. I resent people that think theyre too superior; I tend to knock the shit out of their snotty heads. So plz, be kind enough to take that BS elsewhere.

The [gay parenting] study itself loses credibility as soon as u say it is attributed to only a small portion of the gay community affected by this study. That's the fuck Im talking about. As long as there is no study large enough to encompass, and thus represent the the homosexual people as a whole, any argument pertaining to homosexual parents having no effect on children is unnacceptable.

A constitutional ammendment banning gay marriage is the only real way to curb this problem. Unfortunately, I kindof doubt if it will pass. It's too late to do anything about interracial marriages, interclass marriages, or non-arranged marriages, but if we invoke the constitutional process, perhaps we can prevent the marriage institution from degenerating further.

I don't know about 'reprative therapy,' but if the appropriate research had taken place, it's possible that would could already have a vaccine against homosexuality.

.01% chance of death in pregnancy, 100% chance of death in abortion. Hmmmm...

Blacks, through thier typically racist outlook, believe that America owes them a living. This outlook causes many of them to perpetuate the welfare culture which in turn leads to crime. I am not saying that their skin color causes them to commit crimes, but it is their outlook on life which of course stems from their genetic makeup that causes this behavior.

You see, Reagan opposed communism from the 1940s when the USSR tried to establish itself in Hollywood. He was the only person who had a consistent approach spanning 4 decades.

Finally, if America adopted the Kyoto Protocol [a treaty against global warming], your precious minorities would find themselves out of work thanks to the catastrophic effect THAT would have on the US economy. A study done by some negro and spic organizations (so albeit a very biased study) concluded that 864,000 colored people and 511,000 spics would lose their jobs.

You have obviously not read the website. The last page advocates women's 'reproductive rights' under the guise of 'humanely decreasing the world population.' The website almost sounds to me like it advocates a liberal agenda by Appeal to Consequences. (i.e. if women don't have abortions, civilization as we know it will end!)

African Americans also tend to be black which makes it easy to identify violent criminals. How convenient. God gave us a color-coded guide, almost as good as Bush's color-coded terror alert system.

This country would be a much better place had the south won the Civil War. Slavery would have ended anyhow, as machines were invented to replaced them. It helps if you think of slaves as part of the infrastructure rather than people. In reality, it should be the 'slave descendants' paying tribute to the US Government for granting them freedom. They have some nerve asking US to pay THEM!

haha. No, that was the label I was assigned. I am clearly not afraid of homos. They are obviously sick, freaks of nature, and need compassion and medical care. I guess that view makes me a 'homophobe.' This is how the left works. How come I don't go around calling people that think homosexuality is wonderful and should be 'celebrated' heterophobes? Perhaps I should start. Kenji is a heterophobe.

She might have seen an angel, she might have not. I wasn't there so I don't know. But I do know that there are dozens of references of people interacting with angels in the Bible. There's your proof of the existence of angels.

Well the number 1 reason [to ban it] is that 'the 'bigotry' of America' as 65% of Americans don't want gay marriage. I don't want to have to explain to my kid why two fags are holding hands in the park. Gay marriage destabilizes the society. Once you extend marriage to one alternative group, you have to extend it to all alternative groups. That opens the door for the polygamists, and then the NAMBLA pinheads. Then it opens the door for more cultural debasement: rap music being played in the streets, legalized prostitution, legalized drugs. Gay marriage is just the jumping off point. This is also not my loony theory. All you have to do is look at Europe (esp. Sweeden and Denmark), and it becomes clear that gay marriage is just the jumping off point for a complete collapse of the culture.

We wouldn't be two nations. A Confederate victory in the Civil War would have moved the nation in a conservative direction, helping to preserve the society and culture rather than see the perpetual degeneration that we have today in the name of 'progression.'

If I were dictator people would have to marry someone within 1 tax bracket of themselves of the same race, for reasons I've already stated: 1. Interclass marriages usually lead to the poor exploiting the rich. 2. Interracial marriages aren't looking out for the kids. Since swirls are not socially accepted by EITHER of the two races to which they belong. But my opinion for real-world America is that the 'progression' (read: deterioration) of marriage has to be stopped at some point.

haha.. you guys are just repeating yourselves. All I know is that if I ever decide to committ suicide, I will blow up an abortion clinic in the process.

Because they [homosexuals] are all unemployed and have nothing better to do than harass and annoy people with thier dumbass parades.

That's because I already knew the truth before I started looking. I just wanted to find someone to back up what is obviously true, rather than buy into the alarmist [environmentalist] rhetoric.

I've now finished reading the website, and I still view it with a guarded skepticism. It seems to be an attempt to push an animal-loving, industry-hating, pollution-hating, homeopathy-loving, abortion-loving, government-expanding, drug-loving agenda. I also think the author had a hard time keeping his anti-Bush rhetoric out of the discussion.

The thing that scares me about society today is that we like to give up all the progress we've made. We want to give up religion, we want to give up nationalism, we want to give up capitalism... the irony is that so-called 'progressives' are the ones that want to give up this progress. Go figure.

Doesn't matter [that embryos are mindless]. You Nazis are all alike.

Don't you see the natural progression? You can see it going backwards but not going forwards: Marriage is a union between a man and a woman of the same race and class arranged by their parents. Marriage is a union between a man and a woman of the same race and class. Marriage is a union between a man and a woman of the same race. Marriage is a union between a man and a woman. - WE ARE HERE - Marriage is a union between two people. Marriage is a union between people. Marriage is a union. (I'm implying that at this state animals are involved, but I want to keep the same form of decreasing the definition and therefore the meaning of marriage.) Marriage is meaningless. It isn't a slippery slope because the pattern of progression has already been demonstrated.

LOL. Seriously, though, most dinosaurs were probably extinct by the time Jesus was here. And don't say 'They died 65 million years before' in response to that statement.

I don't know what the hell is wrong with some with you. Being an Atheist is NOT something to be proud of!

In fact, a woman has no RIGHT to an empty womb; getting pregnant is part of being a woman - that's how it naturally is and, though it might seem unfair, that's how it was meant to be. Who are we to accuse nature of imposing on our supposed rights?

It is correct to say that there are living cells in an arm, but not correct to say that the arm is alive - there is a BIG difference. And an arm is much different than a fetus. For one, a fetus is alive and an arm isn't... You can kill a living fetus because it lives; you cannot kill an arm, because arm's aren't alive.