Lions are carnivorous, they have claws, they hunt, they have different teeth—and lions only produce other lions. Never a horse or zebra. ..or a chicken. Your argument here is silly.

Show me any evidence or observation of one fundamentally type of animal changing to another.

dose eveloution and creation con flick ! No it dose not u peapol on the creation side are just as silly as the peapol on the eveloution side ( thow i see my self as a creationist ) ( this is for u athist) now there woulda have to have ben a God to create the universe or the could not have ben a uinverse form the universe to evlove from cause there is was nothing for it to evolve from !!!!!!

dose evolution involve materislisim well not nessasarly the evolution of the body make no differance ( got taht ) IF the sole is didtunished form the body but if there is no sole or the sole a product form the body there is no esenatial differance taht make us different from apes if we have no soles OR our soles evloved from the smae place ape soles did ( we smaret apes )

You have evidence of change WITHIN an animal group, i.e. dingos, coyotes, heanias, & poodles are different 'species' of dog, but the are all dogs. None of them have bunny ears, webbed feet, feathers or hooves.

Ancient man saw them [dinosaurs], wrote about them, sculpted them and drew pictures of them because there were still a few around after the flood. The fact that there are creatures like Loch Ness in Scotland and Mokele Umbembe in the Congo Swamp shows that the sea dwelling ones are probably still existing in these unexplored places.

on one hand we have natural selection - survivle of the fitest- acording to are firend darwin its how a spicies evolved ( dua ) ok, theis could mean 1 of 2 things ither that is the way God just felt like making it ( part of devine plan ) OR a way of elemating devine desing - witch is just stupid , ( what if anamals just happen to mate with who ever they meet with at the time and then kinda go with the flow and it just so happens the week one died out eaten or some thing )

ther is an apsence of of transianal forms in the record and the sudden apprecrance of a new spicheies and most improtanly there is no evdance ther there is any spicheies that evolved it to a diffent spicies ( we are obously difernt from monkies ) how many birdes do u know turn it to elphants whoah there beaks are diffrent mabe that has soem thing to do with the food they eat they did not cahnge spichies ther are still fichnes.

But I guarantee that is [sic] platypus’ were found in the fossil record before they were found alive they would be the missing link of duck evolution or something.

God may have created orgniack life directly or he may had evolved it from inorganick life but nautral prososes there is nothing sicence or theologey can prove ither way God or nature that can make us absoultly certian same with our bodies God could have evolved it or could ave c reated it directly shurly the human body is a compartivaly samll thing to the universe the sole how ever can not evolve it is imosable no matter how many atoms u line up or how complacted u line them up u cant get awholy new thing caplbel of thingking and caring reason self aware ness ( there is sperit at the momet of conseption that is how cloning works ) awarness of the malerial universe is not one more part of taht universe sicence cant say jack about soles not Jack it snot some thing u can mesusre

[The following series of posts by 'Jesusfreek' is brought to you courtesy of <a href="fstdt_faq.htm#contributors" target="_self">lordpuma</a> who submitted them via email accompanied by the following comment:</font> <font color="#808080">"At first I just figured English was his third or fourth language (as may well be the case), but after reading through all of his post (which takes a bit of effort), I can only hope he was under the influence of something you can't buy at Walgreen's."</font>]

tahs a lot of stuff , but hears what i think , ok get this u konw what makes the big differance is not the ida of evolution its the 2 other idias that go along with it , natural selection and meterilisim

now we should define eveloution 1st it can simplaly mean what and when more comlex stuf apperd on earth - proff fossial record 2nd it could mean how it happend naurlral selection 3rd ( the one peapol can get confused with ) the apsance of adevine being ( witch i reuled out earlyer ) now u can put idaas 1 and 2 to gearter but u cant stick 3 in also becuse it is not sien tifick NOT SICENTIFICK u cant argue that theogloy with proof like afossal record cause it is theoogical only

that would mean that life has no meaning ( peapol shoot thems selfes over this ) in sence there is no devine plan there is no reason to live execpt that of we make our selves - witch means everone hear who bother to learn everting taht they have to fight on this forum - hutt hutt hutt were all stupid we made this up we are aruguing about lies we are not justified but a hier being with a greater under standing greater than our own desier become its own reason and its own justifaction ( in such a world i would hope i never had a daughter execpt to sell her)

this is so cause we would have to conclude that there could not have been no God ( persay we dont know witch one ) that our lives would be truly pointles and void and more importanly taht there could be no moral code because there could be no devine hire being than us to make it so our own reasons could become our own justifaciation .

As a believer, I had always thanked God for putting these things here for our enjoyment, but you say there in NO God. Well ok then, if that's the case, do me one small favor.

Would you please tell me the name of the HUMAN responsible for putting all of the above mentioned wonders here for us to enjoy. I would like to give him my personal thanks and apologize for not giving him his just dues in the first place. Please include his address, phone number, and e-mail address if possible.

Your son in law, being a Jew and knowing no better, probably doesn't have the holy spirit. The test for this is asking him wether he can speak in tongues.

haven't you heard the latest scientific theory? A lot of the scientists are now thinking that the big bang theory was just a theory. And that the universe just always existed. They are beginning to rethink it because there are too many "holes" (black holes and the red shift) that can't be answered with the big bang theory. Have to keep up with this stuff you know. Sooner or later, they will discover the truth. And their worst fear is that the Bible is right.

whereas nobody has ever seen any sort of proof of the tooth fairy, God has and does reveal Himself to us. i personally have experienced many many many things that are beyond the explaination of science or other religions; God is real and i knowit because i have seen His work.

also, the toothfairy just does not make sense

[In a debate]

Just as I expected. More smoke and mirrors because that's all you athiests can do when someone has you up a tree with no way down and your bare butt showing.
I will give you credit for trying, but it doesn't work with me pal. You lose.

BEAUTIFUL or NOT, if God didn't create the universe (sun, moon, stars, planets, etc.), WHO DID?