So you don’t like Alan, eh? Is it because he espouses Christian Rights as opposed to those who suppress Christianity? That is what many homosexuals intend in any political agenda. I am both a homophobe (proud of it) and a person that believes in individual Rights. How does one find a balance when each group believes the other is entirely degenerate? Both Christians (Evangelical and Fundamentalist anyway) and homosexuals do consider the other deviant. The first based on Biblical interpretation the later based on secular humanistic relativity. So how does one measure liberty among such mutual aversion?

You cannot find an equitable measure as the two ways of living are significantly mutually exclusive. The answer lies in electoral community standards. I must stress the answer does not lie in a legislative judiciary, rather within the community. In most of America that excludes homosexuals. There are pockets that would accept homosexuality as a community in America. The answer is about community and liberty. General liberty to all, measured liberty in the community. General liberty is the right to believe and speak universally, communal liberty is specific to location.

The idea will probably be unacceptable to both groups. That is also the problem in Afghanistan: Mohammedanism and Western Christianity are mutually exclusive in concepts of life on a socio-political/religious scale.

(Note, the logical flaws in this arguement got badly thrashed in the following posts.)