Gradual evolution expressed the cultural and political biases of 19th century liberalism. Thats what has been passed off in our school systems for 100+ yrs as the “fact of evolution” – the cultural and political biases of 19th century liberalism/satanism/atheism. Basically just demons spewing lies to deceive the masses in oppression towards the Creator.
Our knowledge of DNA and protein in living cells, biochemistry, and mathematical probability suggests that life is the result of design and creation(not time and chance acting on the inherent properties of matter.
Also—.The evidence simply confirms that people have always been people, and apes always apes, as far back as the evidence goes. Thats how pathetic the fraud called evolution is.
32 comments
Since evolution is wrong, that means every new organism is designed and created by this designer of yours. And that means of course that traits are not passed down from earlier generations, and of course paternity tests are entirely impossible.
Really?
He's almost, sort-of got a point in that first sentence. The theory of evolution doesn't express or depend upon any social bias any more than any other scientific theory, of course, that would just be nonsense, but it may have taken a certain political and intellectual climate before anyone was in an appropriate mental state to figure it out, i.e. the scientific, technological, political, economic and social revolutions in 19th century western Europe and its empires - if a bunch of devoutly Christian medieval scholars, by comparison, had found the evidence of the Galapagos before them, would their mindset and that of the society around them have actually permitted them to figure it out?
"Also
.The evidence simply confirms that people have always been people, and apes always apes, as far back as the evidence goes. Thats how pathetic the fraud called evolution is"
Scientific citation? Didn't think so. Right now a biologist, Geologist and Historian are all busy cleaning that spit-take off their keyboards
And yet another person who claims to know what the Bible "really means" has apparently been using it for rolling papers.
Apparently, smoking those red-letter pages makes for quite a trip.
Our knowledge of DNA and protein in living cells, biochemistry, and mathematical probability suggests that life is the result of design and creation
No, it suggests just the opposite, and with increasing certainty. Things like the exact same genetic defect in humans and chimps (the inability to synthesize vitamin C due to the same mutation in the same gene), the exact same inactivated heme gene (used for making hemoglobin) and the same evidence of prior retrovirus infections in the same location. Creationists have no good explanations for any of these.
I just can't get over how many creationists point to DNA, the last great piece of the evolutionary puzzle, as proof that it doesn't exist.
Its like saying "our knowledge of magma and plate tectonics suggest volcanoes are a result of Hephaestus being angry"
Ummm...no. We have tons of transitionary fossils and modern humans don't even show up in the fossil record until (I think) around 100 000 years ago.
And do a little research on mitosis and myosis. It completely supports the ToE.
Okay, then, take the UK lottery's last five results, and look at the probability of those five results happening. In that order.
The odds are 1 in 64 undecillion, 166 decillion, 706 nonillion, 733 octillion, 464 septillion, 100 sextillion, 983 quintillion, 95 quadrillion, 127 trillion, 849 billion, 3 million, 909 thousand and 120.
Then surely, it's the result of God designing those results!
No, it's just a random process.
Massive fail in the OP and the responses.
First problem is argument by "I don't understand it, so goddidit" is stupid.
Humans ARE apes. We share a common ancestor with chimpanzees and oragutans.
19th century, huh. I never realized that Aristotle lived in the 19th century.
Finally there is Evolution which is a fact.
There have been many theories of evolution. Darwin's theory is the best explanation for the evidence.
The evidence simply confirms that people have always been people, and apes always apes, as far back as the evidence goes
HD TVs have always been HD TVs and black and white TVs have always been black and white TVs, as far back as the evidence goes.
Thing is, once a black and white TV gets color, it has changed, and is no longer a black and white TV. Do you see what I'm driving at here? Of course you dont.
Evolution happens bitch. Your acceptance of it doesn't have any effect on the veracity of it.
"Our knowledge of DNA and protein in living cells, biochemistry, and mathematical probability suggests that life is the result of design and creation(not time and chance acting on the inherent properties of matter."
Irreducible complexity...really?
And no, our knowledge of DNA and genetics was the final nail in the coffin for creationism. You idiots just won't let us bury this issue and move on.
"Also
.The evidence simply confirms that people have always been people, and apes always apes, as far back as the evidence goes. Thats how pathetic the fraud called evolution is."
May I add that the evidence also confirms that tooth fairies have stock in Crest, rabbits paint and hide their eggs in the spring, and Santa Claus (Kris Kringle, or whoever his is called in your country) has a fashion line of clothing all in red. Now, I have actual witnesses that the tooth fairy exists (they got money under their pillows), that people find painted eggs hidden about, and countless people have seen pictures of Santa modeling his clothing line. So....what evidence do you have of your claims? I will even accept evidence as poor as the evidence I proffered for my claims.
A early synopsis for 2001: A Space Odyssey had Heywood Floyd engaging in a spot of "Intellgent Design", as a attempt to determine what the monolith's creators would look like...
And the resulting "intellgently designed" lifeform had no head, a mouth leading directly into the stomach, nostrils leading directly into the lungs, it's brain inside a (heavily armoured) torso, 3 legs, 4 hands, & 4 eyes giving it 360 degree vision...
In short, as far as I know, we do not look like this, one can argue that either...
1) Man Evolved via a process of "Evolution" or
2) God was a "Stupid Designer"...
There is no Family "People"
"An ape is any member of the Hominoidea superfamily of primates, including humans."
You get an F...see me after class.
"Our knowledge of DNA and protein in living cells, biochemistry, and mathematical probability suggests that life is the result of design and creation(not time and chance acting on the inherent properties of matter. "
Your knowledge of DNA and protein in living cells, biochemistry, and mathematical probability suggests that you know nothing about ur knowledge of DNA and protein in living cells, biochemistry, and mathematical probability.
No matter how many times you equate evolution with satanism or atheism, it's not going to prove evolution false.
And no matter how much you people whine, you're not going to get evolution thrown out of schools in favor of creationism. That battle has long been lost and you need to get over it.
Our knowledge of DNA and protein in living cells, biochemistry, and mathematical probability suggests that life is the result of design and creation(not time and chance acting on the inherent properties of matter.
Uh, no, it doesn't suggest that. In fact, it suggests the opposite of what you're saying.
BREAKING NEWS!!!
Knowledge of DNA and protien in living cells, as well as biochemistry and mathematical probability has proven Creationism false and Evolution true!
Now we can finally put the issue to rest! Ken Ham, you lose, we win! Suck it!
Wow, this is so exhilarating, to finally be vindicated! I suppose now that man's special creation by god has been completely and utterly disproven, we can at last toss out everything else claimed by the bible as a sack of lies!
...
Wait, you still don't agree with it? What's there to "agree" with? These are the FACTS, see, and...
...
What? You choose not to believe the evidence? You say the eye is too complex to have evolved? But wait! That was just proven wrong by science....(continues on ad infinitum)
We - Homo Sapiens - share at least 98% of our DNA with Chimpanzees (Pan Troglodytes ). The proof is there .
After all, if we came from dirt, why is there still dirt?
...and that's before I ask the debate-destroying question: if dirt is crushed rocks, why aren't we humans Silicon -based lifeforms? [/Xenomorphs in the "Alien" films]
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.