God created all, hands down, no question. How DARE anyone debate God's wisdom! Personally, I think the wrong leader was nailed to that cross. It should have been Darwin for creating his Evo cult.
42 comments
Well, then, it would appear tht you want Darwin to have died for your sins, doesn't it?
If you are a Christian, you believe that Jesus died on the cross for your sins and that was what God intended to happen. According to the Bible, Jesus knew what was going to happen and went willingly to his death. Afterwards Peter preaches to the masses that, although they were responsible for the crucifixion, it was all as God had intended it to happer; it couldnh't have happened any other way.
So your post is moronic for two reasons: First that you aparently think that Jesus' crucifixion was a bad thing for the world (salvation is a bad thing, go figure), and that Darwin is capable of delivering you from your sins.
If there's one thing that really torques my nipple nuts, it's a fundie that doesn't know basic Christian theology.
...do these people, who call themselves Christians, even UNDERSTAND Christian theology half as well as anyone on this website o' heretics? Nope, I guess not.
Well, you do all type of attrocities and impose all type of rubbish when you have never spoken, heard or seen God. One thing is believing and another take for granted that God is a guy who strolls everyday. Try to be generous and good person, not pushy, and stop taking for granted things which are not that evident. It´s like saying, how do you dare to question jedi´s wisdom?.
"God created all, hands down, no question."
Uh, no, one hand at side, the other hand pointing directly at you, no question that your God did not create anything.
"How DARE anyone debate God's wisdom!"
It's easy, Prayerrist, I look at the lack of evidence in favor of creation by your God and I look at the overwhelming evidence against creation by your God, and the choice against God and his supposed wisdom becomes obvious.
"Personally, I think the wrong leader was nailed to that cross."
Personally, I'm certain that Jesus was not divine and did not die for our "sins." Further, the Jesus of the Bible probably never even existed.
"It should have been Darwin for creating his Evo cult."
How generous of you to advocate crucifixion as punishment for scientific discovery.
The ToE is not a cult. Do you even know what a cult is?
God created all...
You have yet to provide evidence of that.
...hands down...
Declaring something to be obvious is not an argument in its favor.
...no question.
If you think something doesn't need to be questioned, you're probably wrong about it.
How DARE anyone debate God's wisdom!
Ooh! Loaded question, there; it's remarkably similar to asking: "When did you stop beating your wife?"
Asking: "How dare you debate God's wisdom?" assumes that God offered us some form of wisdom, which in turn presumes that God exists, which is the very point we're disputing.
First, provide evidence that God exists. After you do this, we'll wait for him to share some of his wisdom. When both of these happen, I will ask God to provide evidence to support what he just said being a god would not excuse him from needing to support his statements with evidence.
Personally, I think the wrong leader was nailed to that cross. It should have been Darwin...
Let's count how many ways you were wrong in that sentence and a half.
1. There is no evidence that Jesus existed, let alone that he was nailed to a cross.
2. Darwin wasn't a leader of anything.
3. Advocating violence as "punishment" for discovering facts is obscene.
So, counting both factually incorrect statements and morally wrong suggestions, you were wrong twice per sentence.
...for creating his Evo cult.
Darwin did not start a cult. If the theory of evolution is associated with a cult, then please do the following:
1. Name the cult's leader.
2. Describe the cult's rituals.
3. Describe the cult's behavioral code/moral system.
4. Name all beliefs the cult holds that are not supported by evidence. We will be checking your facts.
Oh, and is "evo" supposed to be an insult now?
Anyway, depending on how you determine one individual count of wrongness, you have either maintained your score of two falsehoods per sentence or exceded it.
Darwin just compiled all his thoughts about the issue in his book. After that, the Theory of Evolution has changed multiple times, some things have been thrown out, some have been added.
How much have been added or thrown out in your Death and Torture Cult?
Then Prayerrist would condemn strangers in Darwin's name; everything else would be the same.
Darwin managed to codify, in general terms, hypotheses that were making the rounds during his time. He wasn't making shit up like Moses and Saul of Tarsus were so fond of doing.
I think continental drift is instructive., here.
The guy who discovered continental drift published it the first time to wide derision and rejection. All he had was the idea, no one bought into his unscientific ‘cult.’
Then he went and collected evidence. WITH repeatable observations, he published again. Peers reviewed his work and validated his evidence. And bought into it. Now it’s so widely accepted everyone but religious freakazoids acknowledge it as a fact.
Darwin published with evidence, repeatble observations. The fact that it IS mainstream and widely accepted is, in itself, an important fact. Killing him in the name of the god that said ‘thou shalt not commit the Big Murder’ is a bit of a loony take on divine mandates.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.