If the earth was 3 billion years old there would be so many bones piled up the whole earth would be covered in dust and all the what not. Thast jsut a theory scientists made so its more ffesable to belvie we evolved. Which i dont belvie in anyway
The Bible indicates around 6000 years old. Thats all I need to believe the Earth is around 6000 years old.
So how would you explain how everything came from one mass of matter, but some how dates differently? Also, how each planet is not really related in it's make up, but yet is still said to have come from this one mass of matter that exploded. And we have not seen any humans have chimps, or the other way around. You would think that if we were related as science claims, this would happen from time to time. But it never does.
No, your not sorry for the sarcasm. And I more or less expected it. Because sarcasm is all that people can come up with to prove their point when they know their point really can't be proven.
<p>[snip a few lines]
<p>So why don't you tell us what you really think about God and all who follow him. Don't be modest, it's not very becomming of your style.
i was at a ken ham [<a href="http://www.answersingenesis.org/home/area/about/ham.asp" target="_blank">this guy</a>] semenar and it was class he explaned it all. theres no way creation can be wrong it is so logical!
a bunch of meaningless research done to make a meaningless statement about how life is meaningless but they have facts to prove it.
God created man in his image, is God a trilobyte, how about an amoeba, when Jesus came to earth, he came as a man not a virus. If man had stopped looking like how he made them why wold he have mad ethem in the first place, if he is all powerful, why make something that needs a four billion year load time. He is all powerful, he can create us in our present state, he does NOT require nature to help Him.
[Responding to "how do you know that [the earth is 6000 years old]?"]
<p>Its not rocket science, its called believing in the Bible.