You know when you claim that something is supported by science, it better be supported by science, otherwise you look silly.
Hiding after thousands/millions/billions/trillions of years is not science.
This is a question to all evolutionists: Do you believe that you evolved from a rock? I give you all the time you need. Trillions of years, even more, take all you want.
Atheists resent God for giving competition to their sole claims of what is good and right for everyone.
The problem is they want to teach them theories that are fundamentally unimportant to the expansion of man's control over the planet and reality so that they can propagate their selfish desire to "know more than you about the universe and rub it in your face". When they and their logic is flawed from the beginning because they are stupid.
[If you can come up with a scientific theory as alternative for Evolution I'll be the first to congratulate you on your Noble prize.]
I'm afraid if I actually fill that request you'll demand that the only science that matters is yours, since I suspect you're really talking about your religion. But yes, others do exist, and well within the realm of intellectual, empirical science based on other scientific theories.
Then again that rather misses the point, why must the deviating explanation be scientific? Science is not based on fact in the first place.