top

Cannabis Refugee #sexist #crackpot cannabisrefugeeesq.wordpress.com

Mothers are Sluts and I am Fucking Sick of Their Bullshit. A Contrarian Mother’s Day Post.

Even in a non-patriarchal context, unless non-technological parthenogenesis has been achieved, creating a pregnancy would necessarily entail procuring sperm, and that normally means that a male somewhere has achieved orgasm which is usually considered pleasing to men. Human reproduction itself in every context may therefore be dependent on (or at least inexorably linked to) male-pleasing.

However, in a patriarchal context, the male-pleasing is even more clear and even more problematic, especially where and if mothers think that they are better than non-mothers, and that they hold a position of legitimate power and authority over anyone and Holy Shit, mothers do think that, don’t they? Mothers think they have a legitimate claim of authority over everyone, including their own children, other people’s children, and importantly over child-free women, who mothers regard as overgrown babies no matter how old or experienced we are. But this claim of authority is not based in anything legitimate, and maternal authority is therefore not a legitimate authority at all.

To wit, in my estimation, under the current paradigm, women become impregnated, and thus become mothers, under the following conditions: by engaging in heterosexual sex, which for females is a sexuality rather defined by pleasing men; through rape, which is also pleasing to men and which many men find indistinguishable from sex; and via patriarchal reproductive technologies, where women let Big Medicine and Western medical doctors torture and experiment on them, where males are known to enjoy torturing females, males, and nonhuman animals and they do it for sport, and have elevated torture to an artform. Women can also become “mothers” by stealing other women’s babies, which hardly cements their claim of legitimate authority over anyone.

Amargi #sexist #crackpot cannabisrefugeeesq.wordpress.com

We all know that men try to achieve immortality (Gyn/Ecology, Great Cosmic Mother) whereas gynocentric women tend to have a more accepting idea of the process of birth, growth, decay and death. I think female identified women also know intuitively when it’s the right time to create life and when it’s the right time to end it, or not create it at all.

IMO because males and females are literally different species (even according to mayl scientists) “EI” would look different for each of them. Or maybe it only applies to females and not at all to males, since they’re sort of like a large virus/parasite/not actually human in the first place. They’re just masquerading.

Amargi #sexist #crackpot cannabisrefugeeesq.wordpress.com

I’d like to think that those of us with a radfem consciousness have the ability to Spin/See much further beyond what any male identified patriarch could figure out. I’m thinking of gyn/ecology, how Daly basically “saw” into the past, what wasn’t accessible by a surface-level reading of the media, and how she (and others, like Dworkin, who predicted a coming gynocide in RWW) also Saw into the future. Any male identified male will use whatever info he has access to in service of his peepee, and his peepee is the limit of his universe, what he conceive of, what he can fathom, what he can imagine. Same goes for male identified women – men’s peepees are the limits of their universe, what they can perceive in this world and worlds past and future worlds, what they can fathom, what they can imagine, what they can create, how they can think, how they can act.

Sigrid A #sexist #crackpot cannabisrefugeeesq.wordpress.com

Absolutely, the hu(man) revolt against encroaching technology is being pushed in the various algorithms, certainly mine. At this stage, I think the most likely resolution will be a quiet reinstatement of the status quo after this flurry of male outrage. In the testeric chaos, many women will feel compelled to make themselves useful by serving one male side or another, which is imo, the probable reason that males engage in these hype sessions in the first place, whether they are conscious of that or not. As you say, therefore babiez.

Anyone still under the impression that AI/Chatgpt etc, is ‘human’ or intelligent, will probably wake up once the hype has blown over and perhaps a good portion of the population will continue to use AI to summarise wiki articles for them in a soothing voice. While that usage is destructive to critical thinking skills and possibly social skills (though I’m less confident commenting on that), it does not exactly match the imminent threat that would cause men to go to war on the clankers, while women make themselves useful by upholding the human tradition of marriage and babies. These men make me sick. Women’s traditional role is not compatible with freedom. It is compatible at best with material comfort and status.

Also, if any of these men are at the point of crying about robots or have just felt wretched forever ‘for no reason’, I have a tentative theory that they may be naturally miserable because of a subconscious awareness of how dangerous they are to women. Thus, it will probably always remain a great mystery to them. But as far as I’m concerned, that mystery is solved. Women have obvious reasons for being miserable, if they are even at the point of admitting that they do feel miserable. But unfortunately most of them either loudly buy into the pseudo-freedom of material excess, or they sit in sleep mode like robots(!) next to some windbag. And being highly educated does not exclude a woman from being a man’s robot, far from it.