Can you name a mutation that helped any animal in the wild survive? In the experiments with fruit flies, all of the mutations were dangerous, not beneficial. A mutation is not a creation of a new gene, but an error in existing ones.
If you want a solid, fact-based answer, look at some of Kent Hovind’s videos. He gives actual proof as to why large-scale evolution isn’t possible.
43 comments
animals are usually quite well adapted to their environment, therefor any significant alteration to the animal will likely be deterimental to it's survival.
If that animal is transported to a new environmnent however, mutations that would have been deterimental in it's old environment might be helpful in the new one.
Many mutations are stituation based, it pays to have thick fur in a cold climate but not in a hot climate.In cold climates most land mammals evolve thick fur in compairson to similar animals in warm environments.
@BoxerShorts
I can't believe these people still cite convicted felon Kent Hovind as if he has any credibility.
ad hominem
Ah, that old argument - "There are no good mutations!" Fundies seem not to notice the sickle-cell antimalarial one.
First time I've seen them call the fruit fly mutations dangerous, though - normally they just dismiss them as "just mutated fruit flies". (And the mutations were all relatively benign, anyway, IIRC - not dangerous.)
In the experiments with fruit flies, all of the mutations were dangerous, not beneficial
The key word here is "all". You cannot possibly know that all mutations that could occur over the multimillion year timeframe of evolution across the entire planet must all have been negative just because there was no apparent benefit from any in the vanishingly small scale and timeframe of the fruit fly experiments. However, a mutation doesn't have to be beneficial in a single step . Suppose a fly has a mutation that is not beneficial, that may even be detrimental, but is not immediately lethal; it can be survived long enough to reproduce and pass it on. If this is the case, a second mutation among the apparently disadvantaged offspring could have an effect that, when combined with the inherited first mutation, nullifies its effect or even turns out to be beneficial.
"Can you name a mutation that helped any animal in the wild survive? In the experiments with fruit flies, all of the mutations were dangerous, not beneficial. A mutation is not a creation of a new gene, but an error in existing ones."
INDY, motherfucker. Doubles lifespan, thus doubling reproductive chances.
Well, in fact, being black(which is caused by amounts of melanine), prevents you from sunburning. Try again and don´t quote a thief who has no idea of what he´s talking about.
1) Pepper moths' change in colouration. Want more examples of beneficial mutations? I can find 'em.
2) Kent Hovind has been proven to be a fraud - and convicted for it. He is not a credible source of information.
3) Solid, fact-based answers require actual scientific facts, not fiction that has been refuted time after time.
Try again.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
bullshit
"In the experiments with fruit flies, all of the mutations were dangerous, not beneficial. A mutation is not a creation of a new gene, but an error in existing ones"
Like the mutation that created you , for example, DancerLynn.
>:D
"If you want a solid, fact-based answer, look at some of Kent Hovind’s videos. He gives actual proof as to why large-scale evolution isn’t possible."
I'm afraid Kentypoos isn't currently available to give you said actual proof. He's rather busy right now, taking a solid fat-based cock up his arse by his cellmate Bubba, giving him proof of one thing - via the whispering in his ear:
Where is your God now, bitch?!
image
Kent Hovind: 'Help.com!'
Anon-e-moose: 'Zip-it.com'
[/Dr. Evil]
X3 >:D
I love the smell of schadenfreude in the morning. Smells like... victory.
Kentie has yet to demonstrate knowing the difference between atoms, molecules, genomes, chromosomes and all those other scary, big words.
"Can you name a mutation that helped any animal in the wild survive?"
Yes.
And Kent Hovind is an idiot, therefore you are an idiot's idiot.
> If you want a solid, fact-based answer, look at some of Kent Hovind’s videos.
> solid, fact-based answer
> Kent Hovind
What.
"If you want a solid, fact-based answer, look at some of Kent Hovind’s videos"
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Please, stop it. You are literally going to kill me with laughter.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.