If there was a type of anti-gay serum, i would go around and put the potion in a bunch of darts, and start going around shooting all the gays so they would be free of their desease. Not kill them, just rid them of their vile disrupted brains
27 comments
[singing] They don't need a serum. Remember: Antigay would be a perfectly normal, intelligent, and respectable person, if he only had a brain! [/singing]
I guess he spent too much time huffing his "anti-gay" brain-destroying serum, or perhaps some other chemicals.
If an Antigay and a gay collide at high speeds, do the cancel each other out or do they combine to form a neutral?
I guess it would be like matter and antimatter, it would create an explosion equal to the sum of both of their masses. Dear God this could very well destroy the whole planet!
Well... I've had 3 homosexual guys I know mention that they wished they weren't gay. They said that it would make their lives easier if they were just attracted to women. I would guess that if there was a serum available, some would volunteer to take it. (I am not condoning some idiot trying to force them to take it.)
My Mother was born left-handed. She was forced to be right-handed by my Grandmother. My Mother would be punished if she used her left hand. She is right-handed now and has been most of her life. She was forced to conform to her mother's concept of normality.
Is it wrong to engage in psychological conditioning? Some might argue we are all conditioned to some degree by our schools, peers and parents. The act of sharing is not natural, it is something we are forced to learn through positive and negative reinforcement.
Another question in the same vein is why is homosexuality considered an acceptable "life choice" when pedophila, necrophilia, beastiality, and many fetishes are still considered to be psychological disorders or perversions? By what basis do societies decide what is acceptable behavior or not?
Cerebulon , pedophila, necrophilia, and beastiality have a common denominator that homosexuality does not share: a partner that is unable to give consent.
SaneChick said: Cerebulon, pedophila, necrophilia, and beastiality have a common denominator that homosexuality does not share: a partner that is unable to give consent.
Sanechick, there are plenty of things that are not allowed in our society that are consentual: Drug use, bigamy and prostitution come to mind. There are plenty of teenagers who have had sex and are being tried for statutory rape - even though it was entirely consentual. What about the case in Germany where two cannibals got together and ate each other? That was entirely consentual, but the surviving cannibal was sent to prison.
Somehow I think there is more to something being acceptable than whether or not it is consentual.
@Cerebulon --
The thing is, I'm not against bigamy or prostitution. I am, however, against things that harm people; like opiates and cannibalism. When someone's health and life are endangered, *then* I am against a thing.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.