"Genesis 1 and 2 are all the science I need..."
Hardly. That's no science at all. You obviously have no idea what the word "science" even means. Try learning what words mean before you use them.
"...to know that God created everything we see. (and everything we don't )"
And to say that the Bible proves ANY such claim is ludicrous. It makes just as much sense to claim that "Star Trek" proves that Vulcans and Klingons are real extraterrestrial species and that Earth is the capital planet of an interstellar federation. It's called "fiction."
"What more do we need to know?"
Pretty much anything and everything not covered by that snippet of colorful mythlore that constitutes Genesis, or the somewhat longer amount of it contained in the rest of the Bible. We're nowhere near knowing everything, but much of humanity has learned a very great deal since then -- and you benefit from it, like a parasite, whether you grasp that irony or not.
"If God had wanted us to know any more, he would have inspired the writer of Genesis to add that in."
And here we see a first-class example of assuming the premise -- multiple premises, actually -- in the conclusion.
"If it's not in the Bible, I don't need to know about it!"
This comment is so stupid, especially being logged on the Internet via computer, that I am sorely tempted to claim that this HAS to be a poe -- but I know there are quite a few fundies who would put it this way and, at least on some level, really mean it. This is a stupefyingly lazy and self-destructive mode of thinking (if the term "thinking" is even applicable at all), pretty much a confession that the poster is easily threatened by facts that disprove or even just fail to support his delusion. It would be pathetic if it weren't so willful.
~David D.G.
