“Scientists have proven that the sun burns.”
Observed, i think, would be better terminology, here. And deduced.
“Scientists have proven things need two things to burn: Carbon Dioxide and Oxygen.”
Three. THere are three things that need to be present for the rapid oxidization that is a conventional fire (as distinct from a nuclear reaction).
Oxygen, a fuel, and heat.
You fight fires by taking away the heat, the fuel, OR the oxygen.
Carbon Dioxide is not on the list.
This does not apply to nuclear bombs, whether A-bombs, H-bombs, or anything like that.
“Scientists have proven there is no Oxygen in Space.”
So what the sun is doing is NOT rapid oxidization, then, huh?
“Then why does the sun burn.”
HOW is a question scientists can answer, much better than you appear to be able to follow
THe same scientists whose work is the basis of your argument. But you only accept some of their work.
You’re a bit of a hypocrite, ain’tcha?
"The sun burns because God put it there, God created it and it has a special job: to keep us warm and give us hope.”
Hope? Where do you get that idea?
The sun’s going to burn this world to death in a few years, that’s not hopeful.
