then by not refuting my point, we have conclusively dicided that vampires may exist, therefor noahs flood had the possibility of occuring.
44 comments
But bats are birds!
The biggest problem with your argument is that you're defeating your own purpose. As every good fundie knows, if it's not in the Bible, it doesn't exist. Therefore, since vampires aren't mentioned in the Bible, they don't exist, and can't be compared to Noah's flood. Duh.
Vampires may exist, and Noah's flood might have happened. That's scientifically correct.
Of course vampires (Desmodus rotundus) exist, mainly in Central and South America. They're a pest to livestock farmers. Humans who turn into bats and suck peoples' blood and are occasionally slain by Buffy and her friends, are fiction. So is Noah's Flood.
I'm omnipotent, and even I can't figure out your logic.
It's not that Noah's flood is impossible (though I defy anyone to come up with a plausible source for all the water). It's just that the simple fact that the top couple of strata in the geological column do not consist of a worldwide blanket of silt and jumbled, barely fossilized dead things indicates that it didn't happen.
"we have conclusively dicided that vampires may exist, therefor noahs flood had the possibility of occurring."
Who's "we"? You and the 15 voices in your head?
Other than the fact that they're both myths, just what the fuck do vampires have to do the the global flood?
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
