Character assignation is another biggie with evolutionists. It's always amusing to see just how little and illogical evolutionists are. Facts don't matter to evolutionists.
34 comments
Fundie Reality Redefinition at work again. Look, to someone requiring empirical proof, the Bible is not fact.
Listen carefully...a source whose only support for authority is itself is not useable as a proof in logical thought. It must be verified by an outside, independant, objective source.
I am a Christian, and even I don't pretend that the Bible is in any way "proof" of its contents. That's why religion requires faith.
"Character assignation is another biggie with evolutionists."
It's not character assassination when one is brought down by his own statements and actions. We just enjoy pointing out those statements and actions.
"It's always amusing to see just how little and illogical evolutionists are."
It is not "little" or "illogical" to point out the glaring flaws in the the Bible and creationism. Also, the ToE is built of logic, however, belief in the Bible and creationism requires abondonment of logic.
"Facts don't matter to evolutionists."
You are presenting this completely backward. Belief in the Bible and creationism requires you to ignore obvious facts.
Character assignation?, what on earth is this guy talking about?. Facts are indeed what don´t matter to you. Dinosaurs exist and they were NOT AT ALL mentioned in the Bible?, you don´t care. Are there fossiles of hominids which give credit to Darwin?, they are a fake or they can be "forbidden" by a smokey bishop in Africa. The Earth proves to be older than believed........I can carry on.
Character assignation? Damn, this typo is almost as funny as the time some fundie accused atheist scientists of knowing nothing about "cosmetology." (As opposed to cosmology.)
Anyway, nmh, your assertion is untrue. A statement of fact cannot be character assassination. If I point out that "Dr." Kent Hovind purchased his "degree" from a diploma mill and that his dissertation could have been written by a sixth-grader , then I am merely pointing out facts. If the facts make people consider Hovind to be a fraud, that's not my problem.
Anyway, I can't comment on your assertions about evolutionists because I don't know what an "evolutionist" means. Do you mean a person who sees no reason to deny that evolution is a fact? In that case, you are remarkably wrong, but not particularly funny just another fundie with his head up his ass who assumes reality is wrong if it disagrees with him or his book of myths.
“Character assignation is another biggie with evolutionists.”
Yes. We prefer to link scientists who have character with each other, and rebuff those creationists who do not.
"It's always amusing to see just how little and illogical evolutionists are.”
Ah. Like every single time a famous scientist dies, the net goes full-bore petty-little-shits on them? “He NOW knows the truth about evolution and Hell!”
"Facts don't matter to evolutionists.”
As opposed to creationists who INSIST on lumping the Big Bang, Abiogenesis, and evolution as the same science?
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.