So why didn't gays and other perverts evolve a womb in their rectum? If evolution were true that would have happened by now.
64 comments
No. No it wouldn't have happened by now.
But you do seem to be the missing link between man and ape, with that logical fallacy.
So why didn't gays and other perverts evolve a womb in their rectum?
You just might be on to something. After all, you evolved a rectum where your brain should be.
1. That's not how evolution works.
You guys love to pull out "if evolution were true" scenarios and all they do is make it obvious you have no clue what evolution is or how it works.
Because evolution is genetic variation across generations. That is, it involves reproduction. Homosexuality does not result in reproduction. Also, males evolving a uterus where their rectum should be wouldn't benefit the species at all.
Neither evolution or human anatomy work that way.
Why ... I'm stumped! I mean, the children of the Flying Wallendas all have hands where their feet used to be, and we've all evolved little farms in our stomachs, so...
Oh wait, that didn't happen either.
For the same reason that infertile heterosexuals exist.
For a species (in this case, humanity) to survive, SOME individuals need to reproduce. Not necessarily ALL of them.
And by the way, having a womb in the rectum would make it hard to excrete wastes. It would also be totally pointless without the presence of ovaries.
Frankly, I think someone did once hatch a baby out of their ass, and it grew up to post on the internet under the name The_Psychologist2.
^^LOL at women evolving wombs in their mouths.
I can't believe this stupid fucking argument has been said by more than one person. (Actually, at first I thought it was a repeat, but the previous quote had worse spelling and grammar and said "vegans in" [vagina?] rather than "womb") Is there some big-name fundie who said this and they both stole it from him, or what?
What a failure at life. If anything, the genetic presence of homosexuality is there to place LIMITS on reproduction. A species that reproduces beyond the environment's ability to sustain it will eventually go extinct because it will exhaust its resources. Homosexuals will generally not reproduce, but can still raise young and contribute to the group, so they are of great benefit to the population.
There's just nothing you can say to that level of braindead, is there?
Where do you begin? Other than inducing complete amnesia and starting again.
No, it wouldn't have; gays are not a separate species of human being, first of all. Secondly, evolving a full set of female reproductive organs in the rectum would block the rectum, resulting in an absence of any means with which to dispose of waste. This would result in the death of such animals in early infancy, meaning that the genes wouldn't be passed on to the next generation, meaning that the trait would die out immediately after coming into being. Evolution isn't about giving one what one wants, just what one needs. Homosexuality is a rare trait because it generally means that an organism with the trait won't reproduce. You can't convert someone to being a homosexual; it just happens, and it happens infrequently enough that it will never be the dominant sexuality.
So why didn't gays and other perverts evolve a womb in their rectum?
Why would they? It's like asking why don't woman who perform oral sex "evolve" a womb in their throat. What do you even mean by "other perverts"? I have saved the best for last EVOLUTION DO NOT WORK THAT WAY YOU IGNORANT, SIMPLE MINDED, UNEDUCATED FUCK!!!
If evolution were true that would have happened by now.
No, it wouldn't, evolutionary theory in no way, shape, or form predicts anything of the sort. In fact if it were to happen then it would disprove evolution. Evolution doesn't happen to indiviuals, it happens to entire species and never in such a drastic step such as the whole human race sudden becoming hermaphroditic, nor would such a thing happen exclusively to homosexuals, but rather the entire species. Besides, gays and lesbians reproduce at an insignificant rate to effect the species as a whole.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
