There is no such thing as "fish" gene, or a "bird" chromosome, or a "primate" chromosome. There is no such thing as an "inverted", or an "inside out" chromosome. DNA and Genes simply are whole long strands, of many smaller parts which fit together acording to I Ching principles of Yin and Yang. They can fit together in the same way magnets can be attracted, and just how magnets can be repelled some genes cannot fit. That's all. You have superimposed, and force-fitted human and chimp chromosomes to match, and claimed that proves relation when it does not To say "primate" genes is dishonest. There is no genetic mechanism for evolution, or gene change. It can't happen
26 comments
Okay, Genetics 101 For Willfully Retarded Morons.
1. DNA base pairs are made from four nitrogen based compounds that we will call A,C,T,and G. A pairs up with T and C pairs up with G.
2. These four base pairs code for which proteins an organism needs to make in order to live.
3. The more complex and organism is the longer and more complicated its base pairs will become because it will require more sophisticated proteins.
4. DNA is fragile and needs useless junk DNA pairs on the ends of the strain that code for nothing in order to protect the vital strands.
5. The junk DNA varies from individual to individual and even from species to species.
6. When scientists want to check how closely related two species are they look at how much differences are found with in the junk DNA. Species that have more useless junk combinations in common have a more recent common ancestor.
7. Chimpanzees and humans share a 99% similar ratio amongst our junk pairs.
8. Therefore humans and chimps both share a recent common ancestor.
9. DNA ligase is the enzyme used in replicating DNA.
10. DNA ligase makes mistakes. These mistakes are called "mutations".
11. Most of the time these mutations do nothing for an individual's survival such as changing the color of the eye.
12. Other times the mutations are harmful or even deadly and the individual dies before it can pass on it's genes. This is known as "natural selection" and is the mechanism for evolution.
13. And sometimes a mutation will benefit and individual's survival in it's enviroment. These genes are more likely to be passed on and the species will benefit from it. This is called "survival of the fittest".
You're right, there are not such things. Those things happen to have genes, chromosomes and the such.............different to humans and ordered in a different way(and IChing deals now with genetics?, ho ho ho!!!)
And you have a PhD in Biology? No? A Masters? A Bachelor's degree?
Basically you don't know anything? Well, that explains why you are wrong.
Well, gee. If Jake says so, I guess all those biologists wasted their time studying for their PhDs. And I guess since genes can't change, all humans have the same genes, and all that stuff about DNA testing on CSI and paternity testing is a lot of nonsense, since we can't show how closely people are related using DNA. [/sarcasm]
DNA mutations:
Original: The dog saw the cat and ate him
Point Mutation - nucleotide changed:
(meaningful)
The dod saw the cat and ate him
(synonym - different nucleotide, same amino acid)
The doG saw the cat and ate him
Frame Shift Mutation - nucleotide deleted or added, with everything shifted:
(deletion)
The dos awt hec ata nda teh im
(addition)
The dog ssa wth eca tan dat ehi m
Inversion - section broke off and got reattached backwards:
The dog saw the mih eta dna tac
Translocation - a piece breaks off a gene and attaches to another
Before:
Gene 1 - The dog saw the cat and ate him
Gene 2 - The cat saw the dog and ran
After:
Gene 1 - The dog saw the c
Gene 2 - The cat saw the dog and ran ata nda teh im
Taoist fundie? That's new.
As long as there's proper attribution and source cited quotations or excerpts from a larger work can be quoted as a reference or for critical purposes without risk of being plagiarism.
It's used in just about every book that includes the advanced study of any subject. Otherwise people could cover up their own blunders and whitewash history.
I bet Michael Richards had more control over the transmission of certain quotes he's used.
Jake: Your comments were made on a public forum. The comment is linked back to source, no changes have been made, and the author is fully attributed. These can be verified by anyone following the link. Anyone who wishes can see the context the comment was posted in.
This constitutes fair use.
This guy goes from forum to forum around the internet under a number of pseudonyms posting huge masses of random quotes and pictures on Atlantis, energies, Eastern "wisdom", forces, meditation, creationism, etc. No matter how much you argue with him, he won’t even attempt to modify his claims. It never ends.
You want to know how much of a fuckwit this individual is?
Just ONE thread at IIDB provided me with ELEVEN submissions to FSTDT. I think it was eleven anyway, I gave up counting after a while. I suspect the FSTDT mods decided just to settle upon the most obviously deranged submissions on the basis that eleven contributions from one thread by one fundie was a bit much even for FSTDT to handle in one go.
If you read that thread in its entirety, Jake rapidly makes it apparent that he is, not to put too fine a point on it, a Grade A fuckwit. There is no way of avoiding this conclusion, he is a fuckwit.
Wow, is ignorance a new Olympic sport?
Oh, and Osiris, I have to correct something. DNA Ligase JOINS DNA strands that have been broken or severed, but it is not primarily responsible for replicating DNA. DNA Polymerase replicates DNA.
Actually, Jakey boy, quite apart from the bit where you made your statement on a public forum, and the bit where it's been reposted in an unedited form here, with full credit to you and a link back to the source... it's here for the purpose of "criticism and review". It's been posted so that we may discuss it. Ergo, it being posted here falls under fair usage.
Thanks for playing!
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.