I certainly don't advocate any violence.
But you do, and claiming that you don't advocate violence just prior to advocating violence doesn't absolve you of responsibility should anyone follow through with your "non violent" threats.
But I wouldn't mind seeing all of the Democrats chased down the street like the seniors chased Dan Rostenkowski or being hounded out of places like Ben Nelson was hounded out of the pizza place.
How is that not advocating violence? Chasing people down the street implies a clear and direct threat, as does hounding someone out of a public place that they have every right to be.
Moreover, why? What is so sacred about your political ideology that it not only condones, but encourages and justifies physical harrassment for the simple act of disagreeing with you? Why should disagreeing with you trump the rights of anyone, democrat or not, to congregate in a public setting and to hold, speak, and express their own opinions or beliefs as they see fit.
If it happens,
If it happens it will because of people such as yourself advocating violence, oppression, and intimidation to silence those whose opinions are not in lockstep with your own
they have only themselves to blame.
And how do you figure that? How are democrats responsible for your attempts threaten or harass them? Are you so lacking in self control that you have no choice but to react violently when someone or something dares to disagree with you?
