“Why a big bang, why not just a bang, or a little bang... why couldn't the bang be the size of a pea.”
This is the expansion that led to the existence of (checks notes) fucking everything.
What, exactly, is wrong with referring to the birth of THE UNIVERSE as ‘big’?
This is like objecting to calling Eve the ‘mother of all’ when she was really ‘the mother of few’ and those few were the mothers of more, who mothered more, who mothered more, and so on.
"Why wouldn't the bang keep on banging,”
Even if it did, the BBT refers to the point where EVERYTHING stopped being in one spot. It was only in one spot one time.
“what set the paramerters of the size of this bang”
Actually, a critic. Someone who mocked the whole idea of the singularity expanding is the one who coined ‘the big bang’ as the name, and it stuck.
“for it to be any size that it can be claimed to be a big bang or is that claim false, if its false why claim it to be a big bang.”
What an odd, odd objection to raise.
“Sounds like a bit of spice put on something to sell me something...”
No, more like Yankee Doodle. Meant as an insult.
“Well i aint buying it."
You don’t know enough about it for your opinion to matter a shit.
