I think it just depends on what you have faith in the most. Sence sicence is being able to prove something over and over, and no one can PROVE sicence or evelution, and no one was there to see ether happen, it's not sicence. But sence I believe in the Bible and can pretty well prove it's reliabelety through the study of prophecy, I have faith in creationnism because that's what the Bible teaches.
36 comments
"I think it just depends on what you have faith in the most." No, it doesn't.
"Sence sicence is being able to prove something over and over, and no one can PROVE sicence or evelution, and no one was there to see ether happen, it's not sicence.
Science doesn't have to "prove" anything, it simply has to show evidence for it's claims. The claims of evolution have been supported and, therefor, "proved" to use your term. Science also does not have to "see" anything happen to have evidence that it occurred; if it did there'd be no forensic science to speak of.
But sence I believe in the Bible and can pretty well prove it's reliabelety through the study of prophecy
Please, do so. I'm always highly amused when someone uses prophecy to "prove" their absurd ideas.
I have faith in creationnism because that's what the Bible teaches."
And reality shows otherwise. Personally, I'll take reality over the claims of ignorant, superstition ridden nomads any day.
That's some mighty fine spelling you have there, by the way.
sicence is being able to prove something over and over,
But sence I believe in the Bible and can pretty well prove it's reliabelety through the study of prophecy,
"I think it just depends on what you have faith in the most. Sence sicence is being able to prove something over and over, and no one can PROVE sicence or evelution, and no one was there to see ether happen, it's not sicence."Wrong. We witness evolution every day in the form of anti-biotic-resistant bacteria.
Also, there are many more ways to prove something beyond eye-witnesses.
Science IS science because it requires solid, credible evidence, not because it requires an eye-witness.
"But sence I believe in the Bible and can pretty well prove it's reliabelety through the study of prophecy, I have faith in creationnism because that's what the Bible teaches."
The truth is the truth whether you believe it or not.
You cannot prove the Bible reliable on most counts, certainly not concerning creation. You're a liar.
That you have faith in creationism is to admit that you have no evidence to support creationism, as faith is belief in a position with no evidence supporting that position. That makes you an idiot AND a liar.
I believe in the Bible as much as you do, but not for the reasons you do, as your logic is flawed. The flaw in your logic is that, hello, YOU WEREN'T THERE TO WITNISS IT EITHER! I'm a creation/evolutionist, therefor I believe in God, but your statement is redundant. You're saying you can't prove evolution because you didn't witniss it, but you can prove creation from reading ancient prophecies? By that logic, all religion is true, as all religion has written prophecy. I believe in God through personal experience, not just because of ancient text.
SINCE.
SINCE.
What's the matter, are you against a comprehensive education that teaches about all of the options? ;-)
no one can PROVE sicence or evelution, and no one was there to see ether happen, it's not sicence.
One, science doesn´t mean being there to see what happens. Science analyses and takes conclusions. And who saw how the world began, if at the beginning there was only Adam, Eve and God, and neither of them wrote the Bible?. Again, it fails.
Science isn't science because it cant be proved, it can only be reasonably hypothesized given an abundance of clues and evidence that all point towards a reasonable conclusion. But faith is entirely correct because Magic Man Said It's So, and Other Magic Man Saw The Future! with an absolute lack of any sort of clues or evidence that can point to a reasonable conclusion that the written text happened. No one was there to see the big bang, okay sure. I don't remember the bible saying anything about Adam and Eve having a printing press and a lot of paper to write their autobiographies on, either, but at least the big bang theory makes more *sense*. You fail.
The usual fundie circular logic crap. The bible is true, therefore the bible is true.
The entertaining spelling made the post worth reading, though, even if the stale old message did not.
So you believe in the bible since it predicts stuff so reliably, but not in science because, well, when did science ever predict anything...
Thales wept!
Please tell me English is neither your first, second nor third language, PLEASE!
As to the content of your drivel; it was almost as poor as your grammar and spelling.
"Sence" [sic] "sicence" [sic] "evelution" [sic] "reliabelety" [sic] "creationnism" [spews]
"that's what the Bible teaches"
And why it is so favoured among the 'Hoemskuled' set. The Bible: it does the thinking for you.
Andy Schaftafly, I'm looking at you.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
