I wonder if these lower than inferior subhumans have heard of one Kimmo Johan Alm...:
http://encyclopediadramatica.ch/AnonTalk
No thanks necessary, good peeps of FSTDT, I just did my part to eliminate this particular cancer of the internets.
And I wonder if they've also heard of Scotland Yard's Cybercrime division; also Operation Orr, their ongoing anti-paedophile crackdown.
They have b/l/ackup from GCHQ, who monitor all telecommunications, especially the internet.
Thus Operation Orr has been very successful in bringing whole paedo rings to justice. And not only in the UK, neither. It's not just anti-terrorism info they share with the US's FBI/CIA/NSA...! >:D
GCHQ is watching you...!
@ScrewedUpDollie
"Advocating people being killed for finding children attractive is dangerously close to a thought crime."
We in the UK have Section 5 of the Public Order Act. Coupled with our police's Zero Tolerance of Hate Crimes/Speech, it means the likes of Rush Limburger/Mike 'Savage' Weiner (especially via the independent broadcasting body OFCOM, and the legal teeth it has) would never be allowed to say here, what they do in the US. And why doesn't a UK equivalent of Fred Phelps & his WBC exist? You do the maths...!
If such unjustifiable thinking, never mind talking is crushed by legislation, good; if that annihilates even thinking in an unjustifiable way - the way of thinking of those that many thousands of good people died in WWII, in Europe, to erase* from our planet, I'm all for it. There's something to be said for our supposed, oft-criticised 'Nanny State'. If 'Thoughtcrime' results in such unjustifiable mindset(s) becoming extinct, there can never be enough legislation, says I. Forced Political Correctness.
Still, we Brits are famous for our tolerance. Just ask someone who lost a family member(s) due to a Luftwaffe bomb/V-1 missile/V-2 rocket. Or a survivor of Auschwitz. In the case of the latter, I have.
[/sarcasm]
All the US had was Pearl Harbour...
Moral: The phrase 'With rights come Responsibilities'. It exists for a reason.
*- Even before then, the Cockneys certainly had the right attitude, re. the freedom of speech of one Oswald Mosley...!