logical proof against evolution
Why is it the people who seem to think that they have "logical" proof against evolution are the same people who don't know and couldn't give a definition of the word "logical", and in fact haven't even been on speaking terms with logic for quite some time?
no evolution manual came with it
Did you come with an owners manual? No, you didn't, so why do think that there would be one for evolution? Evolution isn't an "it", Evolution is a description of a biological process, not something you buy at Home Depot.
i mean how did we know about the meaning of words
the verbs and the names.
We define the meaning of words. We do not divine the meaning of words. Words are not not some magical pre-existing things that we discovered. We know the meanings because we defined the meanings, not because we "divined" them. We took the term evolution and applied it to a theory that was consistent with the meaning that had been defined for the word.
are they also have an evolution theory?
How can anyone expect you to understand linguistics when you have such a poor grasp of of grammer? There is an evolution process of laguages, but it is in no way related to evolutionary biology, and no amount of you claiming otherwise will ever make it so. The word evolution can be applied to many concepts, anything that exhibit change over a period of time can be said to have evolved, but that doesn't make it the same thing as evolutionary theory which is applied exclusively to biological processes. If you cannot understand that then you don't even have the slightest idea what you are talking about in the first place.
