It looks like many people are on the right track. I don't think that I am paranoid, however, I have never had a flu shot and never will. I had a chip inserted in my pet and noted that all it took was a shot with a small needle.
9 comments
Dumbass probably thinks those chips are GPS enabled too. For those who think you can implant a GPS tracker in someone and follow them for years . . . turn on your phone's GPS, then tell me how long the battery lasts.
Now tell me how you get a years long lasting GPS tracker the size of a small rice grain that sends detailed coordinates every few seconds to be tracked by the government, or in fact any other agency. I've had people tell me GPS trackers are now put in US passports, so the State Department can track everywhere you go. No . . . that's RFID tags. Those don't require their own power, but they require an RFID transceiver in pretty close proximity. These are meant to expedite the customs process in airports, seaports, and border crossings enabled to deal with this system, by digitally storing various pieces of data that can be read by the interference pattern returned when it's hit with radio waves in the proper frequency. I also haven't found anything to confirm that passports are even using RFID tags . . . so may be total shit instead of partial.
@K'Zad Bhat:
I have no idea why the government would bother with RFID tags in passports when a bar code would do. My last passport had some sort of visible bar code which they'd swipe in their machine. An RFID tag would be more akin to those debit/credit cards you just hold up close to a reader and wait for it to beep and register your purchase. They could use them in passports if they wanted, but I'm guessing the swipe method works just as well. At any rate, it's not like they're going to have guys sitting in front of a computer screen tracking your every move as you walk down the street.
One reason I can think of for the RFID tags is that it can be used to scan the passport without even taking it out of your pocket. Also, and RFID tag creates another point needing to be forged, increasing the difficulty.
It also increases the cost of the passport itself, and the systems needed to utilize it. The first two are reasons they might, this last is a reason they probably won't. Any way you cut it, whether they do or not, all this other bullshit is paranoia with no cause, a belief that you're being personally tracked . . . and just like you say, there probably isn't anyone looking that close at you. If they are, you're in a position to fight back, because that would be high level criminals and terrorists, not every Tom, Dick, and Harry in the phone book.
@K'Zad Bhat
Exactly. These conspiracy theorists never stop to think whether or not the government would actually be interested in them, which it's usually not. But they think that since they "know" about the conspiracy, then the government is out to get them.
I had a chip inserted in my pet
Thank you for your willing participation in the first experimental stage of our plan, Terry: as put forward by Prof. Kevin Warwick. >:D
Strange that you didn't say 'They had a chip inserted in my pet', eh...?!
image
So unless you eat only craft materials bought at Hobby Lobby, you already ARE a willing participant in the NWO's plan, via Barcodes: and your 'argument' is pants .
I'm pretty sure U.S. passports have an RFID chip. Mine was issued in 2011 and can be read by machines at the airport to get a boarding pass just by getting close. It is not scanning a barcode.
Here's the thing about the pet RFID, though. First, you have to be close enough with a reader for it to do any good. Secondly, they aren't hard to find and feel under the skin. My cat was a rescue and thus has one. They showed me where it is. They aren't big, but they aren't small either. One could easily find it under his or her skin with a careful and thorough check. Of course, I thought it was aliens that implanted those things. Silly me! Not to mention, merely posting on the internet tells the government as much about you as any chip would. They would know the where and when without issue, and the who with minimal research.
The particular advantage to putting and RFID chip in a passport is it can be the typical form many people think of, with a tiny flexible chip wired into the much larger grid of metal. That gives a lot more surface area to pick up the RFID scanner signal, and to give off the interference signal, and so can get a much greater range. That's why just passing by a scanner gets the information while with a pet chip they have to run it within inches of the actual chip.
If anyone remembers the commercial years ago of the man walking through the store, grabbing stuff off shelves and stuffing it in his trench coat, walking out apparently without paying, and is stopped by an employee . . . to be told he'd forgotten his receipt. This is exactly the technology intended to accomplish this. Each piece of product established for retail sale gets an RFID chip attached somewhere, usually the big antenna type on a sticker, that can be encoded not only with the UPC/EAN/other product number, but can also be encoded with an individual inventory number so it can more easily track how many are bought, because it tracks even individual one. He would also have an RFID enabled bank card that the system now know to charge against his purchases.
Of course if this were to really be done, I imagine many people, myself certainly, would insist on some kind of review process. You would walk through the station to a screen that confirms your purchases, so you can make sure not only that you have all the items you came for, but only the items you want, and that the proper account is being charged.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
