caamib #fundie

caamib #fundie blogger.com

Regarding all this "paedophilia" crap I more and more see the idiotic argument that every adult is automatically in a position of authority over an teen.

What nonsense !

The idea that adults always have a power over a teen in sexual relationships is an ridiculous lie. If you have a teen of about 13 with some intelligence and a needy guy of, say, 25, with not much success with women, guess what will happen? Once she gives him pussy she basically has all the power over him.

SHE WILL PROBABLY LEARN HOW TO CONTROL HIM, believe it or not. She will learn she has something he needs badly and will use that to her advantage. The guy literally has to do what she asks for sex, she makes him buy her stuff and do stuff for her, and at any times she can withhold sex and manipulate him that way.

The idea that HE is somehow in charge is so absurd and unrelated to reality that it boggles the mind. Even if he had some sexual experience before her and she had none it doesn't matter at all, since doesn't stop her from realizing the power she has and using it like a pro.

I have seen this first hand, from an experience my, um, "friend" had :D

12 comments

old comment by Anon-e-moose

Why not just openly admit you're a paedophile, Mary Jane Lick Sick? Your 'Morals' are clearly superior to the laws of the 'Insane' Modern, Feminist West as you keep saying so: despite one of your precious 'Sacreds' being jailed here in Britain for being a paedo nonce: thus your entire 'argument' destroyed.

You subjectively think there's nothing wrong with having sex with underage girls. Gary Glitter, Max Clifford & Rolf Harris would like a word with you about that.

Remember: every second you're not outside Scotland Yard and saying to the world's press present that you're a paedo & there's nothing wrong with having sex with underage girls, you don't have the right to think the way you do: as you annihilate your own 'argument'.

Rights are a product of the Insane Modern Feminist West, so what makes you think you have the right to such. Or, like Glitter, Clifford, Harris & co.: the right to exist?

It's the law that has power over you paedo nonces. Laws which exist to protect the most vulnerable from inferior subhumans like you, cammy-poo.

old comment by Swede

Why is she "giving him pussy" in the first place? That is where the authority lies; the adult's ability to manipulate the child into thinking he or she wants to have sex with the adult.

Often, the adult knows he has something with which to control the child. Blackmail; if you don't do it again, I will tell your parents, your friends, your teachers... A lot of girls have committed suicide in this situation.

If withholding sex makes it into an "impotent" slime-ball, it needs to be deprived of sex. If an immature child is able to manipulate its, um, friend, that says more about the "friend's" mental abilities than the "friend" might want to divulge.

HE can beat her up, tell her family and friends, impregnate her and dump her. HE has a lot of power over a child, yes.

old comment by Passerby

There is one constant in the upbringing of children across all cultures. Regardless of the situation if you are frightened or unsure of anything there is one thing told to you as a child: Find an adult.

They were the ones who knew best, they were the ones you were inclined to believe when they told you something, they were the ones meant to keep you safe, and every time an adult towered over you and spoke a command it would take an act of will not to immediately freeze up and listen. When you were left with an adult by your parents you weren't just supposed to take what they said under advisement they were the boss of you until your parents came back.

Anyone telling themselves they were any different as a child is trying a little too hard to think they're cool. It's such a constant that unwillingness to trust adults is a red flag for abuse in young children, a result of exactly the kind of shit child molesters say should be natural because even though a child might comply it feels completely wrong and being pushed into something that makes them feel that way can affect them for the rest of their lives.

But to the narcissistic solipsists that make up the majority of "incels" I suppose they really didn't think anyone else mattered. They were just there to do things for them. And to Marijan Siklic who is just an attention whoring idiot nothing means much of anything and reality is whatever they say it is until they get bored and forget a few seconds later.

old comment by caamib

Typical passerloon insanity...

- make blanket assertions, which aren't even true, since in situations of uncertainty children can also seek their peers or slightly older children and just because a child is with some adult it doesn't mean they will necessarily trust every adult

"a result of exactly the kind of shit child molesters say should be natural because even though a child might comply it feels completely wrong and being pushed into something that makes them feel that way can affect them for the rest of their lives. "

-make idiotic "it is so" statements despite many events me and those around me experienced, events in which girls as young as 12 actively sought sex. As I told this idiot, go tell my ex that the guy who fucked her when she was 14 (no, passerby, not me since I didn't even know her at the time) because SHE wanted to lose her virginity is some monster. She is completely unaffected by this today, as are some of the girls who fucked as early as 9. They didn't "trust" adults less, they had no other consequences as well. In fact, as I said, many girls as young as 13 MANIPULATE older men with their pussies. Sure, these men might have more experience in daily matters and more education but they're powerless to resist something as precious as such an attractive young girl willing to have sex.

- somehow tie these beliefs with incels, who talk about completely different problems and rarely ever mention this. Those that do are men like Eivind and others that rarely discuss incel. Why would you then say that? Because you're Passerloon. You're insane, it's in your nature to say something stupid and crazy as often as you take a breath. Then say something crazy as

"" I suppose they really didn't think anyone else mattered. "

BUT THESE GUYS I DESCRIBE IN THE POST ALSO MATTER TO ME. I'm tired of them being portrayed as some manipulative monsters when the girls are actually pulling all the strings and enjoying it.

- use some surname I never used at all because an idiot was tricked into believing it was mine in 2011 and think you're somehow harming me, when nothing like that ever stopped me from posting for a single second. Fuck, I had two girlfriends and several other experiences after that shit showed up so you're missing the target mark pretty badly. Make a lie that I forget what I say you can't back up, when just recently you've shown yourself to be stupid enough to call me sexless despite me having a girlfriend and even a fucking daughter.

And this is all Passerloon does. He thinks he is the arbiter of who is the victim even when the "victims" themselves are laughing at him. It's just "you're below age x, you're a victim and everything I say onward follows from". Doesn't matter than you're manipulating a guy with your pussy, that this produces no harm to you, and that you have no harm later, that you don't have trust issues, nightmare or whatever this idiots thinks you have. Nope, you are just the victim because crazy indoctrinated maniacs like him tell you so. Those same maniacs that probably try to make up for the fact they missed out on their own teenage sex and are now ashamed at getting hard-ons for 11 year-old girls.

Passerloon, check yourself in a mental hospital and tell them to throw away the key.

old comment by pyro

Passerby: Kids usually listen to adults, even ones that aren't their parents, because that's what they're taught to do.

cammib: That's not true. Kids can and do manipulate adults all the time.

Passerby: If you're manipulated by kids, then you suck. Most adults aren't easily manipulated by kids. Kids, on the other hand, are easily manipulated by adults. Kids usually listen to adults, even ones that aren't their parents, because that's what they're taught to do.

cammib: It doesn't become true just because you say it over and over again.

Passerby: It doesn't become false just because you say it is.

cammib: It is false.

Passerby: It is true.

cammib: It is not true.

... ad nauseum.

old comment by Anon-e-moose

She has sex willingly

I'll take Statutory Rape Laws and Informed Consent for $400, Alex.

There's an extremely good reason why here in the UK you'll find in credit card & mortgage adverts 'Over 18s Only' and 'Subject to Status'. Also, attitudes to paedo nonces after Jimmy Savile, Mary Jane Lick Sick. Millions of British people can't be wrong, therefore you are.

Maturity. It's a thing.

And no, clips from "Jeremy Kyle" on YouTube is not an 'argument'.

There is no crime

What's stopping you from clicking that thread link in my previous comment, cammy-poo? Oh yes, that's right:

http://www.fstdt.net/QuoteComment.aspx?QID=129067

An imam who sexually touched four young girls during Quran lessons at a mosque has been jailed for 13 years.
Mohammed Haji Saddique, 81

A jury found him guilty of 14 offences - six indecent assaults and eight sexual assaults - that took place between 1996 and 2006.
Judge Stephen Hopkins QC jailed Saddique for 13 years and ordered him to register as a sex offender indefinitely.
"All four complainants were very brave indeed in overcoming not only personal but cultural barriers which they faced in making formal complaints and giving evidence against you," the judge said.
"There is a darker, deviant side to you which this trial has exposed. This was a gross breach of trust - parents sending their young, female children to be taught the Quran by you."
Saddique, who insisted the allegations were a conspiracy by other members of the mosque, has "no idea" of the harm caused by his actions, the judge said

Your 'Sacreds' BS no longer having the right to exist being the least of your problems if you did click on such.

There is a crime: the above proves you wrong. Millions of British people - who vote in MPs who debate on & vote in laws into the statute book - certainly do. As do I.

Time for that dose of crystal meth, cammy-poo: it's proven effects on memory. It's all your entire way of thinking has left.

old comment by Passerby

@ pyro

I feel that's not really an accurate portrayal. You're neglecting the escalating nature of caamib's claims i.e. starting from claiming it's normal for preteens to fuck to claiming the majority of kids will have lost their virginity at something like 10 years old all the way up to suggesting that everyone harbors a secret hardon for toddlers who rather than having child-like minds sprang forth into the world with instinctive sexual knowledge combined with the manipulative powers of cult leaders while adults are for some reason much less capable in those fields and every father desperately wants to stick it in their daughter and other nonsense in addition to simple repetition. (And then of course, denying it said any of this until it repeats it later.) For my part until I figured out that facts don't mean shit to that thing if I responded I would elaborate on my position, show my work if possible. Or at least I'd like to think I did. But I guess by this point that doesn't apply at least not where discourse involving caamib specifically happens. I don't bother repeating myself and I avoid even addressing it directly because that's all it is looking for: my attention.

If you think my position is lacking on the other hand I'd be glad to expound, starting with the running theme of deferring to adults in televised Public Service Announcements and asides worked into children's shows. It wouldn't be wasted effort in that case as you'd actually care about the point instead of your only concern being creating and continuing a conflict.

Edit: Oh and as an aside I wouldn't say an adult that had one put over on them by a child sucks, per se, though it is generally unlikely and when it does happen it's usually a byproduct of the very assumption being debated but overestimated and usually in extreme circumstances. However in sexual matters short of truly extraordinary circumstances claims of a child exploiting an adult are always deflection of personal culpability if not an expression of a full-blown delusional mental disorder and in those extraordinary cases I am unaware of a juvenile offender that wasn't abused themselves, suffering a diagnosed mental illness, or both. But also contrary to what kiddie diddlers want to believe the vast majority (90%) of juvenile sex offenders are male and target younger victims rather than little girls trying to seduce grown men.