“Of course, strictly speaking, atheists do not exist; Literally, "Atheism" measn”
Means.
“"Without a belief systems"
Without a systems?
“and since they *do* believe without solid proof “
Is ‘solid proof’ part of the definition? Do you have ‘solid proof’ of your rejection of Thor? Or Ra? Or Innana?
“that thier is no diety,”
That THERE ARE NO DEITIES, thank you very much.
I don’t think any religion has provided solid proof that their deities exist.
"they *are* believing in something.”
Now, just show us the Belief SYSTEM involved in atheism, then? I don’t believe in your god, i don’t believe in anyone else’s gods, because the arguments are unconvincing. What’s the belief system involved?
I don’t think you’ve managed to show that ‘atheism’ doesn’t apply to my stance.,
"I prefer Andiest or Nondiest myself,”
And we give a flying fuck for your favoritism, why?
“but as has been discussed, I can be a condescending ass when it comes to being precise.”
Except you lack the spelling skill to really justify being condescending, and you skipped a little bit of the definition of atheism you’re using. I don’t have a belief system, just weighing your evidence/arguments and not being compelled by them.
You’re trying to fight fire with fire but you’re mostly countering fireworks with wet bottle rockets. Your tit for tat is more tat from a twat.