My French ancestors were from Normandy (before leaving for Quebec in 1648), so its very disheartening, to learn that Normandy is no longer safe.
France needs to grow a spine, and end its policies of mass immigration. They should also consider deporting, some of the people they have allowed in.
If the Polish people's Republic could steal Germany territory (Neumark, Schleisen, Pommern, Ostpreussen) and expel millions of Germans (without compensation), from their own homes, then surely France can find some legal mechanism for reversing its mass immigration policies.
The Czechs got away with expelling 1/3 of their pre WW2 population (mostly ethnic Germans), and those people had been there since the 13th century (when the Bohemian monarchy promoted German settlement in Bohemia). Therefore, there is legal precedent for deporting people from France.
18 comments
Alex D: "France needs to grow a spine, and end its policies of mass immigration. They should also consider deporting, some of the people they have allowed in."
Someone Else: "Which ones should they deport?"
Alex D: "I thought that was obvious! The ones who are nig"(DONNG)
Mix of truth and nonsense.
No, there just needs to be more sane deportation policy. Peaceful Muslims don't need to be deported, only monitered (aside from secular Muslims). Criminal Muslims, sure, I think a lot of Muslims who have committed crimes need to be deported. I think the same thing with most immigrants who have committed crimes. Scumbags should have no right to immigrate, only law-abiding citizens. If you deported criminal scum, you'd have less terrorism and less crime.
Oh, what happened in Eastern Europe to the ethnic Germans there was a crime (mostly on behest of Stalin) that would be even more of a massive tragedy if the Germans hadn't already committed a greater crime. Let's not commit Stalinist crimes again. Stalinist crimes only have a legal precedent since they weren't German/Japanese crimes.
"My French ancestors were from Normandy (before leaving for Quebec in 1648
...Alex D is a hypocrite of the worst kind. And in his first sentence, no less.
What would've happened to you if your ancestors were never allowed in what would become Canada...?!
So many of Donald Fart's cocksuckers would do well to ask themselves the same question. After all: has Wiggy shown us his birth certificate...?! [/Col. Tom Parker]
Legal is what ones laws say is legal. That's not a good moral argument and can change like the weather. Do you really wanna live in a system that would arise if Cheney, Koch Brothers, Churches, Trump or Limbaugh had absolute power? Clue, you don't unless you like being enslaved to provide luxury for the few.
@Time To Turn
Monito ring peaceful Muslims is a bit Trumpesque. Are you a follower of Pat Condell?
Why did they leave Normandy, if it was safe before now?
Poland stole German territory? How did that become German territory?
France is a colonization country; lots of its immigrants come from old colonies. France should have thought about the trouble with mass immigration, before it sent out its population to migrate en masse to other parts of the world...
So, deporting immigrants out of Canada is also legal?
The French legal system does not apply a rule of precedents. And the whole thing with Germany was made after WWII through treaties, so it has a legal base.
And finally, why would an immigrant criticise immigration. Glass houses and all that.
As I`m from Poland myself, let me correct that horseshit from OP...
These teritories ethnicaly were always inhabited by their own people before certain polish king brought the germanic holy order to wipe them out and "civilise" the place. Which they did right before turning against their benefactor. Fast forward few centuries, these regions were administered by german born nobles while most folks in the territories had polish ethnic roots. Then the fucking krauts used the place as a casus belli in the second world war and after that soviets wanted to make an example of the region so they gave all that to us, which was Stalin`s idea(so we in turn wouldn`t feel bad for soviets taking about the entire eastern half of Poland). Also the part about the lack of compensation isn`t entirely true. Yes, they did receive only the barest recompense from the soviet union but after its fall we and germans started a pretty succesful cooperative effort to set things right.
My distant ancestors came from Normandy to fight and seize territory, which they promptly did, uprooting my other ancestors who painted themselves blue. I'm sure the British would have preferred William the Conqueror and his army to just stay home in Normandy, but no, it's in the nature of armies to go to war and change forever the places where they choose to invade. That upheaval of civilizations mingling and assimilating, or conquering by violence, is in large part the story of nearly every group of individuals on the planet.
1. Having had Norman ancestors 3 3/4 centuries ago does not give you proprietary rights over the region.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
