And not surprisingly, atheists/darwinists/liberals advocate for exactly that. They encourage people to smoke crack and heroin and meth and everything else that will ruin their bodies & their lives and kill them. And they want the state to pay for running houses in which people ruin themselves in those ways! They call them things like "injection sites" but an accurate name would be "Abomination of Hell sites."
All of which just goes to show yet again that without God, humans become unimaginably evil.
29 comments
Yeah dipshit, lets see who likes your little heroin pills the most... Good honest christians it seems. Also fuck yeah I wanna smoke and I wanna snort and drink and perhaps even engage in sexual activities right after and as long as I can remain a productive and sane member of society you HAVE NO FUCKING BUISNESS telling me that I cannot, in fact nobody does.
Btw. nice little mental trick there, using only the names of the substances that cannot be safely enjoyed because of their terminal toxicity combined with their impossibly addictive properties. Why wouldyou not use say weed? Or Coke which in it`s pure form is easily controllable with some degree of will and moderation. Circumventing the intellects indeed fuckoo.
I'm sorry to say that he's completely right. Which of us does not remember Richard Dawkins's hit work "The Not Smoking Crack Delusion," or Bertrand Russell's "Why I am Not a Person who Doesn't Smoke Crack," or the book which started it all off, "On the Origin of Species by Means of Smoking Crack?" It's all atheists' and scientists' fault, all of it.
"without God, humans become unimaginably evil."
Correction: without God, evildoers just find other "justifications" for their evil.
Yes, yes! Our species is lost, lost I say! We need Him to touch our hearts with His righteous Penis, that we may come into - I mean, enter - His holy domain!
While I have heard some liberals call for the decriminalization of any & all drugs, I've never heard one call for more drug use. And I think what Navaros is referring to here is the needle exchange program, which was designed to get junkies to stop sharing needles and spreading HIV.
What about atheists/socialists? I'm no liberal, so I don't feel singled out by your statement.
I guess that what you are referring to is places where people who are already drug-addicts can get new clean syringes and perhaps find a bed for the night occasionally. All that is done to keep people alive, not to encourage people to do drugs. How is it unimaginably evil to want to help people stay alive? If the drug-addicts are provided with small amounts of safer drugs and a roof over their heads, they will, firstly, not be out doing crimes to finance their addiction and, secondly, might get a chance to get their life straightened up and try to fight the addiction. Unimaginable evil, indeed!
What was it Jesus said again? I was sick and you cured me, I was in jail and you visited me... Something like that.
Gee, because Christians never use drugs. Not like I'm related to several that are living proof of the contrary...
Then again, Navvie defines "Christian" as "belief in the great Righteous Holy Wang," and as they are the only adherent to that... actually, they're probably still wrong. Crack is a hell of a drug, it seems...
Actually, the only groups I see promoting the use of drugs are companies selling alcohol and tobacco, both of which can ruin bodies and kill the user. The drugs you mention are banned from safe houses and needle exchange sites, where addicts are actually offered options for kicking their habit if they want to.
Sorry, but as bad as hard drugs are the people using them aren't unimaginably evil. Hitler was unimaginably evil. Pol Pot was unimaginably evil. Kim Jong Un is unimaginably evil. Being addicted is not unimaginably evil. Neither is providing those people with halfway houses that give people a safe and clean place for their addiction where staff can try to wean them off of the drug. But no, conservatives would rather pretend that either addiction doesn't exist or let addicts die because "they deserve it".
@Norman I've been to the isle of Patmos, where the Not Further Identified John was exiled, and it's close to the proverbial desert island. If I were there, I'd certainly smoke anything available out of sheer boredom.
image
It is puzzling when folks who call themselves Christian and believe they are "better" than the average person vilify and want society to ignore those who suffer with addiction. Is that what Jesus would allegedly do? Obviously even with god, certain people are pretty "evil."
Wanting to offer services and housing to those who use drugs does not equate to "encouraging" them to use. I'd say that ignoring people who need help is cruel and inhuman. And, also, needle exchange programs, housing, and clinics for those addicted to drugs benefits society and public health in general.
They encourage people to smoke crack and heroin and meth and everything else that will ruin their bodies & their lives and kill them.
I'm sorry, who are the ones who will let their children die as they insist that all they need to do is pray as they watch them waste away...?
Also, spoken like someone who has no clue how addiction works. Hot tip, the first step in getting clean isn't "Stop using, OMFG" it's harm reduction.
@ heleninedinburgh:
I'm sorry to say that he's completely right. Which of us does not remember Richard Dawkins's hit work "The Not Smoking Crack Delusion," or Bertrand Russell's "Why I am Not a Person who Doesn't Smoke Crack," or the book which started it all off, "On the Origin of Species by Means of Smoking Crack?" It's all atheists' and scientists' fault, all of it.
That actually brightened my day.
I'm just going to post this here because...why the fuck not? It makes more sense than everything Navaros has ever written combined.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1aJ2xRo98Ys
Favourite line: "Jamie, what do you like to do instead of jabbing a syringe full of heroin into your cock?" - Kenny Hotz
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
