"Obama More Aggressive Than Bush Against Al Qaeda"
These dipshitocrats are are trying to make Barack Insane Obama MMMM MMMM MMMM, look tough because I have noticed that since this IRON HANDED PRESIDENT stole the office the rag head terrorists have stepped up attacks and have drawn blood. If flight 253 was a successful operation then it would be curtains for this administration and the rodents that follow them. He's sounding a little tougher now because the last attempted attack left shit stains in those pink bloomers of his. He can sound tougher all he wants but right now he's just running that mouth of his with his eloquent news conferences. Think he's going to push back at the terrorist? I'll bet he just slaps their widdle hinny's.
Does Obama have to read the terrorist their right before attacking?
Talk is cheap.
41 comments
I am reminded of this old chestnut from your tough-guy g. w. bush:
"We will not tire, we will not falter, and we will not fail."
He tired, he faltered, he failed. He fucking failed like no other before him. So much for rightwing conservative christianity and it's relentless pursuit of teh ebil terrsts.
As I recall, fundamentalist Muslim terror ALSO stepped up after Bush was elected. You know, in the form of 9/11. Funny that you conservatives wouldn't shut up about it for 8 years and now even Rudy Giuliani is conveniently forgetting about it.
The fact is that these are criminal actions, not military. We aren't being attacked by countries, but by smaller organizations. Criminal actions should be dealt with using police actions. Bush decided to respond to a criminal action with, in his own words, a crusade, and look where that got us.
Iraq wasn't overrun with terrorists until after your fuckwit Dubya invaded it and destabilized the whole region.
Do you mind telling me how attacking a country that had no ties to Al Qaeda, Osama bin Laden, or the attacks of 9/11, helped the war on terror?
And let's talk about 9/11 shall we? Whose watch did it occur on? Who was told by the previous Clinton administration to keep an eye on Bin Laden's organization. Who then did NOTHING to prevent these attacks?
You conservatards sure have a short fucking memory.
[...dipshitocrats...Barack Insane Obama...stole the office...rag head terrorists...rodents...shit stains...pink bloomers...slaps their widdle hinny's.]
[Talk is cheap.]
It sure is, dave. It sure is.
And, yet, you're still blabbing.
Oh, and it's President Obama to you, dipshit.
So dave. A little quiz.
1) In what country did the underwear bomber get his help to make his bombing attempt?
2) Into which country were several suspected but untried Guantanamo detainees released?
3) Who released those detainees?
4) So who's really slapping widdle hinnys?
President Obama "stole the office" with 53% of the popular vote and 365 of the 538 electoral votes.
And just because Obama doesn't find some Arabic-speaking country to invade every time some fanatical Muslim nutjob tries to bomb an airliner doesn't mean he's doing a bad job.
"He's sounding a little tougher now because the last attempted attack left shit stains in those pink bloomers of his."
And Bush jumped right in Air Force One and flew around in circles at 42,000 feet, terrified that the terrorists would hurt him, while Cheney drags a biohazard suit and gas mask everywhere he goes.
Both of them were draft dogers during Viet Nam.
Yeah, you cons are real tough guys.
When an election is so close that the hanging chads in the State of Florida decide it, its winner is a "mandate of the people".
When an election is won by such a large margin that there was never any question who won it, its winner "stole the office."
"OK (chuckling), you've covered your ass now"----George W. Bush to Richard Clarke,, when Clarke was trying to warn Bush in August of 2001 of an impending massive Al Qaeda attack on the US.
"I don't know where he (Osama Bin Laden) is; I don't spend that much time on it"---George W. Bush
Even national security people who worked under Bush have said that Obama has been more aggressive toward Al Qaeda than Bush ever was. And they haven't "stepped" up their attacks on us, we had multiple attcks under Dubya, including the Shoe Bomber and the attack on El Al at LAX among others, not mention, of course, 9/11.
I don't think it's in Obama's job description to read people their rights, or to attack someone personally.
Stealing an election? At least he didn't have to stoop to de-registering people he didn't think would vote for him, or to send the most outdated and malfunctioning voting machines to the poorer black districts.
Obama used that other tactic; saying smart things, being eloquent, and having a career on his own merits, and not on daddy's money. I know, it looks like cheating, doesn't it?
If you don't have any real arguments, you'll have to settle for hate campaigns, libel and mud flinging. That is even cheaper.
I'm also wondering about that mmmm thing. WTF?
And a successful attack would have been a blow to the administration and the people who voted for it? Funny, it wasn't curtains for Bush after 9/11 happen on his watch. The fucker parlayed it into scaring Americans shitless about the potential of being bombed or raped or converted to Islam if they didn't vote for him and his bloodthirsty puppet fucker master, Cheney--i.e., he was re-elected after the attack.
History: U R doin it wrong.
Wow, so much stupid in such a small paragraph.
There has been one failed attempt at blowing up a plane on Obama's watch. Fatalities, 0.
Let us compare to Bush.
4 hijacked planes, Fatalities: 2966 dead. One attempt to blow up a plane.
And now you don't like it when Obama takes the legal route and has the guy who roasted his nuts read his right? Too bad.
And where is your enlistment form? You are so gung ho about fighting, why are you sitting on your fat ass typing this out instead of signing up?
And just how did a duly and legally elected president 'steal' the election?
"Talk is cheap."
Yeah, no shit, "dave".
So wait, you say that under Obama, the terrorists have drawn blood... and in the very next sentence say that the attack wasn't successful?
Hmmm... unsucessful attack... vs. 9/11. Now... which one drew more blood...
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.