Atheist immorality.
An atheist can't speak to sexual sins. That is not a natturailst concept. Swaggart had snipers threats, bomb threats and all manner of satanic attack. It was sexual sin that made his fall. Atheism says sex is for the most powerful males of a species.
Swaggart has repented of his sin. Have you????
47 comments
Indeed, sin is impossible without a deity to offend, however, I don't mistreat others, sexually or otherwise, because I have a good ethical standards. One doesn't need a deity to behave well.
I know how to think. Do you?
Atheists don't believe in 'sexual sins', or any sin at all, really. Sin is something that displeases a god. Atheists don't believe in a god, so we don't believe in sin.
We DO, however, believe some of the so-called sins, as they're based on more realistic moral issues: Killing, for example. And we have one more moral that many gods (including the Christian God) don't; I've never heard of an atheist that was a rape apologist.
"Atheism says sex is for the most powerful males of a species"
After reading those biblical quotes on the rape blog of a few days ago, I think this guy's got it upside down... Sex is for the man that can overpower and rape a women anytime he likes. (At least according to the one god.)
I am of the opinion that televangelists who rake in the money are not servants of god. They are servants of Mammon. They are using religion to feather their nest. They sell religion, and that is the sin of simony, is it not? And it is fools who keep pushing the money at them. You cannot buy god.
Now how can you possibly know,,Coadie, whether anyone has repented or not? Is it not a supreme arrogance on your part to assume that one sinner has repented and another hasn't? Isn't this a sin in its own right?
Atheists don't believe in sin, so of course they don't speak of it. Duh.
What you're saying is that one can do any damn thing he or she wants as long as they repent?
Way to get around personal morality, there.
"Atheism says sex is for the most powerful males of a species."
Atheism doesn't say anything about sex, it says a person doesn't believe in any god.
You can be atheist and sexist, just like you can be theist and sexist. In fact, if you are a theist, there's a good chance your religious texts are the product of a patriarchy (most are) and claim that repression of (and submission by) women is part of your god's holy plan.
Even if you confusing evolution with atheism, evolution doesn't say sex is for the most powerful males of a species, it says the males most able to thrive in their environment will increase their representation in the gene pool. This might be by being strong enough to see off all rivals and secure exclusive breeding with a grounp of females, or it might be by being sneaky enough to evade the stronger males and mate with females anyway. Evolution says (very loosely) that males are 'ardent' (they want to breed and will do just about anything to do so) and that some will be more successful than others.
Coadie makes these absurd non sequitor statements all the time. He also brags a lot about being:
* An olympic trainer,
* A yaght racer,
* An adviser to the Iranian finance minister,
* A brain surgeon who also moonlights as a charity obstetrical surgeon, (yet has no clue what the hypocratic oath is)
* A farmer,
* A rancher,
"Atheism says sex is for the most powerful males of a species."
I think you are confusing atheism with an ignorant interpretation of evolution. For example, here in Michigan gartar snakes come out of hiberbation in the early spring. The primary urge of the male snakes is to mate with each female as she comes out of hibernation. You will often see several, sometmes dozens, of males chasing each female. Some of these males act "gay" and try to mate with other males. This scares the homophobic male snakes and they give up the chase.
Guess who ends up mating with the females? Being "most powerful" does not equal being most successful in breeding strategy.
You must be talking about the first time he was caught in 1988. At least that time he apologized, but he still refused to serve his mandated punishment from the Assemblies of God church that he claims to follow and stay off the air for three months. I guess the creep's greed got in his way(both his cousins Jerry Lee Lewis and Mickey Gilley claim that he is the richest member of the family and the most venal). The second time that he was caught in 1991 he just ignored his church's punishments and said "God told him to". This would be sad enough for a supposed preacher of the "Lord", but this hypocritical piece of shit rolled over on two competing televangelists(Gorman and Bakker)and had them forced off the air. Coadie, I know that you are a dumbass and an easy mark for any religious scam-artist, but this jerk hasn't repented anything(except getting caught).
I can, too, speak to sexual sins. It usually goes something like, "Hi, sexual sin." "Hi, yourself, big fellah, wanna party?"
Swaggart can do anything his penis wants him to do. All he has to do is repent and ask for forgiveness, then he is off the hook. What a morally bankrupt religion he practices. As an atheist, if I did any harm to another person (a very unlikely situation), I would make amends to that person. I would attempt to make that person whole again. Praying to an invisible sky monster, asking for forgiveness, does nothing for the victim.
Forgive me, I've sinned!
image
It was sexual sin that made his fall.
...
Swaggart has repented of his sin
Sounds a little different here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jimmy_Swaggart
According to this entry after repenting his sin he was, alittle time later, caught in act with another prostitute and this time told the public that god told him that "it is not your business". Demonstrates very well how deceitful fundamentaist priests can be ;)
I agree btw. that sexual sins are no atheist concept.
Which shouldn´t prevent Atheists from speaking of them, after all you (fundamentalist religious folks) invented them and now the concept of a sexual sin is there. And if you fundamentalist religious folk think you can speak of non religious things, like science (for example the theory of evolution) non fundamentalist folk and even atheist folk has the same right to speak of sexual sins.
Oh and as others already mentioned, the theory of evolution doesn´t say that it is the strongest male that gets sex. It can be the most beautiful, the best singer, the snmartest animal or whatever the species has that determines exual atractiveness (and in lots of species it is usually the females that select the male that is allowed intercourse with them)
WTF? "Sexual sins" are only relevant and powerful, because Christians, the majority, THINK that they are relevant, and, thus, MAKE them relevant.
If it is immoral to think otherwise, then I do not care, since it is immoral relative to your religious preconceptions. It is an arbitrary, and essentially inconsequential morality...one that I am happy to not possess.
Atheism says sex is for the most powerful males of a species.
Main Entry:
athe·ism
Pronunciation:
\'a-the-?i-z?m\
Function:
noun
Etymology:
Middle French athéisme, from athée atheist, from Greek atheos godless, from a- + theos god
Date:
1546
2 a: a disbelief in the existence of deity b: the doctrine that there is no deity
Hey, what do you know? It looks like atheism says nothing of the sort.
Swaggart has repented of his sin. Have you????
Your use of multiple question marks highlights you as an a**hole.
An atheist can't speak to sexual sins.
Speaking to sins!? As if speaking to an imaginary being wasn't enough, now they've started speaking to imaginary things...
Atheism says sex is for the most powerful males of a species.
Humans do not work the same way as deers or lions, you fuckwit!
Atheism says sex is for the most powerful males of a species.
So females don't get any say in this? The most powerful males just run off with the other powerful males and leave the rest of us to stare at each other?
Take a guess why our species is approximately 50% male and 50% female.
Edit:
That's quite a resume coadie has there, and I though I had done a lot of things in my life.
"Atheism says sex is for the most powerful males of a species."
What the hell? Look around you dumbass, anyone can get laid. Well, except you.
An atheist can't speak to sexual sins.
Even if you could, why would you want to?
That is not a natturailst concept.
No, you're right that isn't. The naturists are the ones that like to be nude a lot.
Swaggart had snipers threats, bomb threats and all manner of satanic attack.
That wasn't satan. That was more likely to be the hordes of christians that he had pissed off by taking their money and spending it on hookers.
It was sexual sin that made his fall.
If that translates as "took money under false pretenses and then spent it on hookers." Then yeah, I agree with you.
Swaggart has repented of his sin.
No one has seen any evidence of that except for coadie, who has a pair of magic glasses that allow him to see into peoples souls.
Atheism says sex is for the most powerful males of a species.
Something tells me that you've been hanging around the saunas too much :)
Funny, I thought atheism just meant "Without belief in theism."..sheesh, now I know better. I suppose I must now say that you are not allowed to have sex anymore you weak pathetic little man!
www.jesuschristarcade.com
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.