America will not be able to end terrorism. Only the Lord will do that when He returns.
Why don't we take care of the other thugh-run countries? Honestly, there are two reasons: 1) the communist / liberal press would not stand for it. 2) Liberals such as Klinton have literally gutted our military.
As for the WMD's. Do any of you deny that Saddam used WMD's on his own people? What more proof do we need? By the way, if the UN had done their job, we would have found the WMD's a lot sooner.
Why haven't the baltics been attacked by terrorists? Correct me if I am wrong, but these countries, as well as much of europe is rapidly giving in to the muslims. Oh, as for other european countries not being attacked by the mus terrorists...Can we say SPAIN? Can we say Subways? Can we say Bus attacks? Terrorists are attacking at every chance they can - they attack anyone who does not succomb to their perverted beliefs. Why is America the major target? We are a CHRISTIAN NATION that actually stands up for ISRAEL (sometimes). This angers those of the muslim persuasion. This is why they hate us. It is ironic: aside from our worshipping the one true God in contrast with their paganism, they actually tend to idolize the American way of life. You can see this by looking at their young people. They dress and act very American.
Now, finally, false pretences. Well, that is a liberal lie. All you have to do is listen to the true reporters (what few there are), and you will see the truth. Take a look at World Net Daily (www.worldnetdaily.com ) Though I do not completely agree with everything they post (they are pro-cATHOLIC, for example), but they have a good take of the news. You should read it.
29 comments
America will not be able to end terrorism.
Not with its current refusal to address the root causes of terrorism and understand the context within which it develops, no.
As for the WMD's. Do any of you deny that Saddam used WMD's on his own people? What more proof do we need?
Yeah, he used them IN THE EIGHTIES. That was two decades ago. Got any proof he had them this decade? No, of course you don't. He just used it as an act because he needed his own military to believe he had them in order to maintain his grasp on power.
And the rest is a repeat of another post. I find it hard to believe anyone would consider WorldNetDaily an even remotely credible news source, though. Talk about biased journalism!
Hey, numbnuts. They really don't care that we're a Christian nation, for the most part, although they surely associate western Christianity with their own poverty and repressed lives. They hate us because we keep messing around in their business and supporting the corrupt rulers that oppress them.
The United States military is far from gutted. The Air Force is actually downsizing right now because it's overstaffed. The Army isn't downsizing, but it's hit its recruiting quotas consistently in recent months. Clinton made no effort to hide his hatred of the military, but don't give him so much credit.
Randy, you said "No Politics"!! Liar liar pants on fire. You are a GOP flunky toad, lying for their agenda, as well as a teacher of bigotry against women. The worst part of this, scumball, is you hide behind misinterpreted scriptures to sell this brainwash to impresssionable teens! God will remember the 9th commanment even if you don't Randy, better pray quick for forgiveness, he doesn't like people to mispell his name G-O-P instead GOD.
'Do any of you deny that Saddam used WMD's on his own people'?
Of course not. But the guy Bro Randy thinks was the greatest US president ever, Reagan, sold them to him in the first place.
Not only that, but when Saddam committed his single worst atrocity, the gassing of the Kurds, it was in 1988.
While Reagan was still President.
Why don't we take care of the other thugh-run countries?
"Thug" only has one "H," and for some reason a Bible quote is coming to mind here....something about beams and motes in eyes...?
By the way, if the UN had done their job, we would have found the WMD's a lot sooner.
Um, Randy? No WMDs have ever been found in Iraq. The UN inspectors didn't find any, the US Marines didn't find any, the CIA didn't find any...
Why is America the major target? We are a CHRISTIAN NATION that actually stands up for ISRAEL (sometimes).
Well, yes, some terrorist organizations do have a major problem with the US support of Israel, and, in fact, with the very existence of Israel in the first place? Do you know why? I suspect you don't, so find a book about hhistory in the Middle East that covers the years between 1948 and 1955 and it should clear it up for you. I think you will be very surprised to learn that when the US backed UN established the nation of Israel, there were people living there already. People who had been living there for thousands of years and had had nothing to do with the Holocaust in Europe. They were understandably miffed when they were told to "get out, we're giving your land to the Jews." How would you feel if the combined forces of the ECU, Russia, and China showed up and demanded that you vacate your property and land because it was being given back to the American Indians? I bet you dollars to danish that you would be among the first to start up your own armed, terrorist resistance...
Now, finally, false pretences. Well, that is a liberal lie.
Really? Liberal lie? Who said we were invading Iraq because they were an imminent military threat to the United States due to their possession of WMDs? Liberals? Nope, that was Bush. Who later changed the reason for the invasion to the "fact" that Hussein was attempting to acquire WMDs when no evidence of WMDs could be found by anyone? Liberals? Nop, Bush again. Who then changed the reason for the invasion to "bringing freedom to the Iraqi people" when it became clear that the "evidence" for the acquisition of WMDs by Iraq was fraudulent? That damn liberal media? Nope again: Bush. Bush has altered the justification for the invasion at least three times so far.
And what do you call it when you claim one thing, then change it to another, and then another...? Correct! You call it "false pretenses!"
As for the WMD's. Do any of you deny that Saddam used WMD's on his own people? What more proof do we need? By the way, if the UN had done their job, we would have found the WMD's a lot sooner. Using the same logic, I can prove that the USA still uses slaves, that Viking ships still covertly raid England, and that Korea still has a navy of Turtle Ships (we just haven't found them).
What more proof do we need? By the way, if the UN had done their job, we would have found the WMD's a lot sooner. According to Ritter's report... nah, screw it, just read the thing. It basically says that the WMD search was conducted efficiently and with co-operation from the Baath party - with the exception of when it was learned that the US CIA had infiltrated them - without uncovering WMDs.
There were no WMDs in Iraq. To believe otherwise is intellectually equivalent to not believing in global warming.
As an English person free of the American Liberal MediaTM , I had the privelege of watching Blair and Bush frequently trip over their own words with everchanging bullshit rhetoric about WMDs from a relatively unbiased news source. I can tell you now, Randy, there were most definitely false pretenses. If it were up to me, Blair and Bush would have been out on their arses (but not just because of this).
America will not be able to end terrorism. Only the Lord will do that when He returns.
goddamn it, i hate his fucking logic! "we can't do anything, only by the grace of god will anything happen to us" stfu bro. dandy. your god hasn't helped you yet, and he never will. you're living in a fantasy.
Make up your mind, either God will end terrosism or the tough countries. By the way, are you seeing Israel or Iraq, how tough they are and the result?. And since when are Muslim pagans, do they worship Zeus or Riganni?
*No WMDs were found in Iraq during Bush's invasion. Reagan sold them to him in the first place, and he burnt them all proving he had 'em.
*America is not a Christian nation. It was not founded on Christianity, no matter how much you claim otherwise.
*Islam is not paganism, technically. They worship the same God you do - the major difference is that they don't believe Jesus was divine.
*Look up "liberal" in the dictionary and realize that it's not an insult to most people.
*Bush kept changing his reasons for invading Iraq, which calls into question his true motives. Considering that there were no WMDs, Saddam was not developing them, Osama is in another country, and the Iraqi people don't want us 'liberating' them, I'd say we have no legitimate reason to be in Iraq any longer.
*World Net Daily is as reliable a source of unbiased information as the National Enquirer. Of course, by "unbiased," you really mean "completely skewed to my views," don't you?
*Believing that the only 'reliable and unbiased' news sources are the ones you prefer seems a bit ridiculous. In fact, the way you state it makes you sound like a conspiracy theorist.
You fail again, Randy. Next time, try basing your claims in reality.
I get the feeling that Bro. Randy might have been thinking of the Balkans here. I don't know the demographics of the Baltic states off the top of my head, but I'm pretty sure they don't have a huge Muslim population. Bosnia and Albania (which are part of the Balkans), however, are mostly Sunni due to the decades upon decades they spent under the rule of the Ottoman Turks.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.