Why has no one mentioned observational (conventional) science vs. historical science? Observational or empirical science is done in the here and now--the type science that gives us computers, antibiotics and automobiles. Historical science cannot be proven by observation or experiment in a lab as it is in the past and cannot be repeated. One must rely on data and facts (like fossils or historical records). We all have the same facts and come up with different conclusions. This is due to your starting bias or worldview. BOTH the atheist and Christian view of the past can not be absolutely proven. Both rely on faith in their views. Both are what is commonly referred to as RELIGION. Yes, the strongest atheist is just as religious as the staunchest Baptist. Atheism is a religion. For this reason it should not be taught in public schools. Therefore, if you are going to teach atheistic evolution, then creationism should be taught also--that way the student can choose which religion the facts fit the best. Any pro-choice liberal should agree with the right to choose--right?