Scientist: "We don't know everything, but we have more evidence that points to X.", where X=Intelligent Design".
Hoot: "What's the X stand for?"
Scientist: "Well, X = Intelligent Design. Everything we discover points to it. We just can't say it publicly. The kids need new shoes, you understand."
41 comments
Even in his fantasies this guy is retarded.
"X equals intelligent design."
"Okay, so what does X equal?"
There is no evidence or (un)intelligent Design. Where it is published ? Nowhere. So stop your obscurantist propaganda, burn your bible, learn to think by yourself (throw your badass religion in bin) and the world would be better.
So X does mark the spot.
Where it's stupid.
Right, right, it's a big conspiracy. Just remember: you can't spell "conspiracy" without "piracy", and they can still hang you for that.
2 Scientists who work for Discovry institute or any other organization that promotes intelligent design:
Scientist1: "We don't know everything, but we have more evidence that points to X."
Scientist2: "What's the X stand for?"
Scientist1: "Well, X = Theory of Evolution. Everything we discover points to it. We just can't say it publicly. The kids need new shoes, you understand."
Science =/= Creationism
Get it right.
When all evidence contradicts the nonsense you make up, ALWAYS argue that there's a conspiracy that tries to suppress the evidence that could prove what you claim. These creationist losers are so incompetent, that the only argument they have left in this day and age is the "evil evolution conspiracy".
Does he not think that definate, irrefutable proof of God would be the biggest scientific discovery...fuck it, the biggest ANYTHING discovery in the history of mankind? What idiot would not publish such evidence?
I discovered cold fussion last weekend, but I thought there'd be mroe money and fame in it if I kept it to myself.
Does he not think that definate, irrefutable proof of God would be the biggest scientific discovery...fuck it, the biggest ANYTHING discovery in the history of mankind? What idiot would not publish such evidence?
I discovered cold fussion last weekend, but I thought there'd be mroe money and fame in it if I kept it to myself.
ID fails from a purely philosophical level.
1)ID says that complexity must be designed.
2)This means that the designer was more complex than current lifeforms.
3)The designer must have been designed as the designer is complex.
4) Repeat steps 2 and 3 until you're bored.
5) At some point there must be an undesigned designer. This designer must either be supernatural or come from natural processes.
6) Science can't address the supernatural, therefore it's not a scientific theory.
7) If the designer came from natural processes, then the assumption that complexity must be designed is wrong.
Either way, ID is not science.
(#672067)
"I love intelligent design. The fundies who push it are too stupid to realize that it destroys the very foundations of their own religion. If a 'perfect God' designs something in 'his own image' why does it have to keep changing to adapt?"
*rational mind off, pretend-fundie hat on*
Ah, that's an easy one. Initially, the first humans were perfect, with no need to adapt to anything. The committing of Original Sin, however, changed all that, resulting in their being cast out of the paradise called Eden and into a world of much toil and suffering, where to this very day, we must all change to adapt ourselves to the desires of the heavenly Father and His Son, and thus not only better endure the hardships of this world, but assure ourselves of everlasting reward in the world to come.
*pretend-fundie hat off, rational mind on*
Now, please excuse me while I wash my hands more thoroughly than even most obsessive-compulsive people would, merely for having typed all that.
Some day I'm gonna meet "scientist" and reflexively kicked him in the nuts for all the stupid, Non-scientific shit he's been telling fundies.
Does he think it's funny? Is he a 'Mad Scientist"?
Point blank, if I had just one verifiable, falsifiable and testable proof of an intelligent designer I would INSTANTLY stop being an atheist and parade it boldly and loudly across the entire globe daring people to prove me wrong. I would win so many scientific prizes and cash monies.. the catholic church and the mosques would all be kissing my ass to get me to sway in their direction...
..the kicker is I would still consider the designer to be malevolent and unworthy of worship. But I wouldnt be an atheist anymore.
“Scientist: "We don't know everything, but we have more evidence that points to X.", where X=Intelligent Design".”
If ‘intelligent design’ is supposed to be the quiet part, why say it OUT FUCKING LOUD in the opening?
God DAMN this is stupid.
BUt, hey, if scientists have the evidence for intelligent design, why don’t you list the evidence and/or the sciengists?
And where were they at the Kitzmiller vs. Dover trial?
“ Hoot: "What's the X stand for?"”
He just TOLD you what it stands for.Were you not paying attention? My god, it’s YOUR fantasy.
“Scientist: "Well, X = Intelligent Design. Everything we discover points to it. We just can't say it publicly. The kids need new shoes, you understand."””
If a scientist can’t say it publicly, he’ll obfuscate. “It’s a general trait of universal development, well known among idiots, and people who eat lead paint, but not something we can really explain to the more mentally competent of the planet, see? Sorry.”
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.