[Politicians who support health care bill are target of threats, RR thinks that it's all shenanigans to discredit conservatives]
It's all part of a plan to raise the threat level so they can begin cracking down on all opposition. Remember , people will trade the security of being able to go to the mall and consume consume consume for everyday freedom.
19 comments
Yeah........
Go fuck yourself.
I bet that 4timedad was saying "Why would you be against wiretapping if you have nothing to hide? Are you a TERRORIST????" six years ago.
Also, I think he may have said his last sentence backwards. Don't you usually say "I want to trade [thing I have] for [thing I want]"? It makes it sound like he's saying that people will give up security for freedom, which kinda undermines his point.
I see, hear from, and read tirades by people who are convinced that the healthcare bill is eevviill and the work of the Antichrist and that its supporters should/will all burn in Hell etc. etc. (I won't name names but you know who you are).
And you want me to believe that none of them have tried to tell it to the people who voted the bill through?
4timedad: supporting freedom of speech but denying that it might have consequences.
"Remember , people will trade the security of being able to go to the mall and consume consume consume for everyday freedom."
You mean like when Bush started two wars, got the unconstitutional PATRIOT Act passed and told people that they should go shopping?
@ Rallymodeller
Jesus, Rachel Maddow didn't have to do that. Anyone with a pulse and IQ above the freezing point of water knew that the Bush administration was manipulating the alerts to keep the sheeple askeered.
Of course, it might have been nice if they had actually done something with the warning they got in August 2001. Which you can bet your ass a Gore administration would have done.
people will trade security for freedom, it's happened in other countries as proof.
but honestly, ALL politicians are subject to threats because no politician is unanimously liked.
and what does security/freedom, have to do with the healthcare bill?
the only bad thing I've found reading through the documentation is the price of life per year policy (unless it's been amended) and the fact that doctors are getting one HELL of a paycut. :P
The point you are trying to get across, I think, is that consumerism is not freedom. It is, in fact, the everyday freedom you are referring to. Thusly your point is redundant.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.