If [The Bible] isn't evidence, then your science books aren't evidence either.
14 comments
The science books aren't the evidence, it's merely the description of the evidence.
The Bible has only itself, there is nothing behind it. If that is evidence, then Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them, is the evidence of Nifflers.
For the bible, substitute Harry Potter, a Betty Crocker cookbook, the Peterson Field Guide to Birds, or The Poets and Poetry of Linlithgowshire, and your statement makes just as much sense.
"Two people say they're Jesus, one of them must be wrong."
This is their bullshit 'same-siderism' that their blind faith is as valid as authoritative voices of any kind. What did Hitch say about that shit? See first response.
“If [The Bible] isn't evidence,”
“then your science books aren't evidence either.”
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
