AudiR10 #fundie

AudiR10 #fundie townhall.com

Interesting that the liberals believe sexual intercourse should be public, but prayer and worship should be private, isn't it?

75 comments

old comment by JD

that's embarassing dude, so no, we don't think that.

You know WHY its so damn private?

Its because people look bloody STUPID when they're having sex. Know how all those pornstars only look KINDA stupid? that's because they're good actors. Most of us look quite dumb, and no one wants to get stared at with a "what the fuck's is THAT?" from others while you're trying to get it on? way to ruin the mood. And no one else wants to be seeing you do that anyways. some of us are trying to eat you know.

Just one more reason why sex is an intimate thing requiring consensual partners and quite a bit of trust: you really have to be pretty close, OR be a little tipsy, to have sex without snickering...

old comment by John

No, liberals are consistent. Sex and prayer should both be private. On the prayer issue, Jesus agrees:

[color-blue]"1 Take heed that ye do not your alms before men, to be seen of them: otherwise ye have no reward of your Father which is in heaven. 2 Therefore when thou doest [thine] alms, do not sound a trumpet before thee, as the hypocrites do in the synagogues and in the streets, that they may have glory of men. Verily I say unto you, They have their reward. 3 But when thou doest alms, let not thy left hand know what thy right hand doeth: 4 That thine alms may be in secret: and thy Father which seeth in secret himself shall reward thee openly. 5 And when thou prayest, thou shalt not be as the hypocrites [are]: for they love to pray standing in the synagogues and in the corners of the streets, that they may be seen of men. Verily I say unto you, They have their reward. 6 But thou, when thou prayest, enter into thy closet, and when thou hast shut thy door, pray to thy Father which is in secret; and thy Father which seeth in secret shall reward thee openly. - Matthew, Ch. 6

old comment by Neil

I think he has a point, really. Just not the point he thinks he has.

I mean, if sex were allowed publicly, who would actually be hurt? Nobody. It's safe, fun, totally natural and a beautiful thing. The only people who could argue that they were being "hurt" are anti-sex prudes who can't stand anything that raw and uninhibited, and religious freaks with their "sin" baggage. You might think it's disgusting or unsanitary. Fine. Don't do it! Many people would be envious in truth, but cover it with disapproval. Most would likely eventually get used to it, but probably regard it as "immodest" or "showing off."

I think we should turn the tables on people who wear their superstitions on their sleeves. Why should I be inconvenienced with the stupid shit you believe? Why should I have to be exposed to your emotional gratification and perverted logic? How come I can't get freaky in the park, but Jesus freaks can do battle for my immortal soul, damn me to hell, rob the gullible and manipulate the fearful. All in a public, graphic orgy of superstitious frenzy mixed with cynical self-importance. A permanent, loud, ugly orgy that I can not constitutionally stop.

Yet if I have the audacity to "free willy" in public, the sexually uptight have the rest of you, both religious and non, convinced that I am some kind of dangerous pervert that needs to be locked away and put on a sex-offender list for life. All because otherwise sane people have, because of their own insecurities, accepted the totally bullshit notion that sex is somehow bad.

I would be all for public prayer if I could sit on the next bench down getting a hummer. A little messier than prayer, perhaps, but so is anything worth doing!

In the end, all I can do is say once again, to the Christian prudes, the insecure sex-haters, and especially AudiR10: SORRY ABOUT YOUR PENIS!

AudiR10 #fundie townhall.com

75 comments

Confused?