The reality of human history is that human beings are rebellious. Historically what force has been able to hold the masses in check ? Only three are apparent:
1. Brute force as in the case if Communism, Fascism, Marxism, and to a lesser degree, socialism.
2. Rigid religious systems with stiff social penalties for disobedience such as is found in Buddhism, Hinduism, or Islam.
3. The freedom and liberty which comes with acknowledging the Christian absolutes as reality.
42 comments
In many cultures, around the globe, no force is necessary. The love of fellow man and recognition of one's place in society are sufficient to the maintenance of peace and good order. As an asside, there are NO stiff penalties for "disobedience" under the Buddhists.
As to freedom and liberty under Christian absolutes, I daresay you need to read a little more history, my friend, and spend a little less time with "DrDino". Of course, the content of your post gives every indication that you are a warped, twisted fucktard, so I suppose the advice is wasted.
Ooh, you seem to be a bit off. Let me proofread for you.
1. Brute force as in the case if Communism, Fascism, Marxism, and to a lesser degree, socialism and to a greater degree, Fundamentalism.
2. Rigid religious systems with stiff social penalties for disobedience such as is found in Buddhism, Hinduism, or Islam and especially Christianity.
3. The freedom and liberty which comes with acknowledging the Christian absolutes as reality and even greater freedoms of NOT.
I guessed it, that Kent Hovind, aka Dr. Dino, would be the new face of the Religious Right. He already is.
Well, he's right about there being three ways to hold the masses in check: make them afraid of what will happen to them in this life, make them afraid of what will happen to them in the afterlife, or make it so they don't mind the current situation. Unfortunately, he seems to mix up what causes the second and third.
Hadanelith's right, this appears almost sane if you switch Buddhism and Christianity - but it's still not quite right, as "freedom and liberty" don't require acknowledgement of any religious absolutes at all.
Marxism promotes brute force? Wasn't it about brothership and equality?
Buddhism is a violent "religion"? What happened to casting of the earthly desires and living without even killing ants while walking around?
Christianity promotes freedom and equality? But of course that is if you are christian and white. gays, Jews, blacks, Asians, Buddhists, Muslims and all those others are inferior anyway.
Where are those rebellious Scandinavian, Dutch, British masses who are not held in check by any of the three items?
Oh yeah, they are probably classified under 1. A decent welfare state probably is seen as communistic by this idiot.
Where are those rebellious Scandinavian, Dutch, British masses who are not held in check by any of the three items?
Here I am! And I fear for my life. You know, with all the brute legalized euthanasia and abortions. I might be aborted before I know it, and let's not start about how I might end my own life if it becomes unbearable.
<2. Rigid religious systems with stiff social penalties for disobedience such as is found in Buddhism, Hinduism, or Islam.
3. The freedom and liberty which comes with acknowledging the Christian absolutes as reality.">
These statements definitely qualify this for the "Death by Irony Overdose" award, IMHO.
I'm with Anti-Goth on this one. Death by irony overdose.
By the way, NotMe, Jains are the ones who sweep insects out of their path, etc. (but Buddhism is strongly influenced in some ways by Jainism)
The reality of human history is that human beings are rebellious. Citation, please. What do you mean by "rebellious?" Rebellious against who? Historically what force has been able to hold the masses in check ? Only three are apparent:
1. Brute force as in the case if Communism, Fascism, Marxism, and to a lesser degree, socialism. Communism, socialism and Marxism together are redundant. Try deleting one and adding "fundamentalism."
2. Rigid religious systems with stiff social penalties for disobedience such as is found in Buddhism, Hinduism, or Islam. Buddhism has few strict penalties for disobedience. Try removing Buddhism and replacing it with Christianity.
3. The freedom and liberty which comes with acknowledging the Christian absolutes as reality. This point is poorly expressed. Viewing the Christian absolutes as reality has never brought freedom or liberty. Furthermore, your use of the word "acknowledging" seems to imply that Christian absolutes are reality. Since point three is redundant with point two, try collapsing it into two, and instead writing:
3. Freedom and liberty for all.
F. See me after class.
Y'know what happens when people acknoledge the Christian absolutes as reality? THE CRUSADES happen. FASCISM happens. People are burnt alive because they believe a fractionally different set of absolutes with less stained glass and less Greek.
People die. Horribly. Painfully.
Christian ideals all sound very good on paper, but when you mix them with reality and human nature they become another way to persecute people.
Freedom and liberty in xianity? All i see are rules and restrictions and commandments of various sorts, some even incomprehensible and utterly stupid (let alone inhumane) for that matter, and yet here you are: making it sound like a paradise of some sort.
You make me sick.
Four before yours
Family and extended family
Tribal code
the village
the kingdom
All of them with their values and faults, all of them preceeding your first two.
Your third one is Christian arrogance and historically wrong, there are tons of examples of religious torture states and brutal enslavement of the masses.
"The reality of human history is that human beings are rebellious. Historically what force has been able to hold the masses in check ?.......The freedom and liberty which comes with acknowledging the Christian absolutes as reality."
sign up now and you too could curb your rebelliousness with the freedom and liberty which comes with acknowledging the Christian absolutes as reality. 'cos it's not a contradiction, honestly.
"1. Brute force as in the case if Communism, Fascism, Marxism, and to a lesser degree, socialism. "
Christianity could be quite brutally forceful
"2. Rigid religious systems with stiff social penalties for disobedience such as is found in Buddhism, Hinduism, or Islam. "
Islam and Christianity are both rather rigid and punitive in their punishments
"3. The freedom and liberty which comes with acknowledging the Christian absolutes as reality.
"
because Christians will leave you alone. But not if you aren't Christian. And I found Paganism rather free and liberating as many atheists have found atheism so
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.