“An Atheist cannot smell, touch, taste, or see the beginning of the universe,”
No, but we can deduce many things about it if we use SCIENCE.
“thus they really have no idea whether a transient being exists, or not,”
Transient? We’re all transient. We exist temporarily, coming and going in a short span of time.
Did you mean transcendent?
Yeah, a transcendent being would be supernatural. Atheists TEND not to believe in the supernatural. Or, our demands for evidence are seldom meant…
“despite all the overwhelming evidence makes the possibilty of current state of things in the universe being an "accident" or random”
Makes the possibility…what? Compelling?
Impossible? Did you ever consider letting the post wait for an hour and then reading it before sending it?
And, no, the general idea is NOT that everything is random. Laws compel certain things to happen predictably.
“like how If the elements in our atmosphere were even a few percentage points different, every living thing on earth would die.”
Oh, yes. If the conditions we evolved in were different, we wouldn’t be alive. Kind of like all of the great-die-offs we’ve identified in evolutionary history, huh?
“Are you kidding me, you ask me to believe that something that random to have occured?”
No. I really don’t give two flying fucks what you believe. I WOULD like you to actually UNDERSTAND it before you dismiss it, but clearly that’s asking quite a lot.
“Sorry but I'll keep my transient being theory,”
Good luck with that. Hope some day you’ll figure out what the fuck your theory is.
“though how irrational, it is far more rational right now than anything anybody has thought of.”
No, it’s really not.
You don’t know fuck about the ‘theory’ you think you’re mocking, which makes you look pretty idiotic.
