All history revolves around the Bible
First the Bible: Whether people agree with it or not, the fact is, the holy scriptures verify the truth of history the best. This incomparable written record is the most accurate and trusted of all for a reason. It passes any test devised by man or time. No other recorded holy document or book compares. Real history, archaeology, mathematics, and science align themselves continually with it.
29 comments
Let's see...
Genesis? A mixture of pre-Judaic Semitic folktales with an unverifiable procession of heroes. About the only thing that comes close to provability is the likelihood that a good chunk of the (Levantine) Hebrew culture came from Mesopotamia.
Exodus? Completely garbled memory of the expulsion of the Semitic Hyksos from Egypt. Not to mention Jericho during the time of the Exodus was a borderline ghost town anyway.
The Torah? A late compilation by the priestly court of King Josiah and successors, attempting to reconcile multiple related but competing threads of pre-Judaic mythology.
Judges? Unverifiable, and probably written well out of time, or we'd have a bigger clue who the Philistines were.
Then you've got the quasi-fictional Esther, the wholly fictional Job, the two Isaiahs, the multiple Daniels, erotica in the Song of Songs, outright hardcore porn with BDSM overtones in Ezekiel 23, and really weird and depressing stuff like Ecclesiastes (Qohelet was an emo kid...). Not to mention not-quite-matching histories of the royal houses of Israel and Judah that spin successful reigns (the ecumenical and prosperous reigns of Omri and Ahab over Israel) as evil and praise kings who were ineffectual, defeated (Hezekiah), or just figureheads (Josiah).
And out of all that mess came a group of people who, by and large, are among the more reasonable contributors to Western society, and in return they have been reviled. Go figure.
Nice analysis, Brian X, although I've always liked Ecclesiastes. It's the one book that never seemed like it was cramming God down my throat.
It'd be interesting to see which translation TL Adamson was talking about there. Five will get you ten he means that chainsaw-job the KJV. *Sigh*
Real history, archaeology, mathematics, and science align themselves continually with it.
Except when they don't, which is quite a bit of the time.
The speaking snake tempting Eve is accurate?, Caine´s wife magical appearance is accurate?, a man living 900 years is accurate?. What has the Bible have to say about what happened to the Celts, the Romans or the Greek people at the time?, or the African and American ones, for that matter?, with which sources does it coincide, can you cite one?
So, in which chapter is Australopitecus mentioned? What does it say about the cave paintings in France? How does it explain Stonehenge? What, according to the Bible, was it that made us start using fire?
First the Bible: Whether people agree with it or not, the fact is, the holy scriptures verify the truth of history the best.
It's important not to confuse reality with wishthinking, what one would like. It is a false premise. Not because people disagree or not, just because the holy scriptures are human tradition and a mix of moral stories, origin myths, a few historical references, the propaganda of ancient peoples for nationalism and the power justification of elites, etc. The literary styles of the books are not history. Your best source for history would be the current mainstream history textbooks.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.