Even Muslims say things that make biological sense sometimes. A young woman such a 12yo marries a older man that has establishes himself is a form of natural selection which helps to pass on genes of the more successful males through a greater likelyhood of him successfully producing one or many children than if he marries an older woman.
(comment right after that)
Age certainly is relevant. how many 16 , 17 or 18 yr old boys have been charged with statutory rape when they had sex with their 14 or 15 yr old girlfriend. So what if a 22 yr guy marries a 12 yr old girl. Its none of anyone's business.
20 comments
< A young woman such a 12yo marries a older man that has establishes himself is a form of natural selection which helps to pass on genes of the more successful males through a greater likelyhood of him successfully producing one or many children than if he marries an older woman.>
Morbo, do you want to field this one? Thanks.
NATURAL SELECTION DOES NOT WORK THAT WAY! GOOD NIGHT!
I'm ignoring the complete ick factor of an adult marrying a 12 year old completely.
Marrying someone successful, regardless of the ages involved is not natural selection. There are no genes to determine if someone is going to be a success in life, only that they have a better chance of surviving to reproduce in the first place.
The rub of it is that most human civilisation nowadays has found (mostly) non-biological means to remove the enviromental pressures that would encourage natural selection
Red Baron: "So what if a 22 yr guy marries a 12 yr old girl. Its none of anyone's business."
Not Red Baron: "Then a 22 yr woman could marry a 12 yr old boy and it would be none of anyone's business."
RB: "NO! That would be something else entirely! In such a marriage it would be the WRONG WAY AROUND who, by virtue of age, *has power over* whom!!"
Not statutory rape because both are minors. Statutory rape because one is a minor and the other not.
It would seem the notion of abuse of power simply flies over his head. Although, coming from a nazi, abuse of power is kinda their trade.
I guess that a 12 year old wouldn’t be mature enough to give informed consent doesn’t matter to RB*, because a woman’s consent doesn’t matter to him regardless of her age.
*I refuse to call this asshole by the name of one of my earliest favourite computer games.
@Oxymoron
You obviously have no idea how Stormfronters work!
"pure" white genes=success
Any other genes=Instant failure.
Duh!
@Kuno
*I refuse to call this asshole by the name of one of my earliest favourite computer games.
One of my favorites, too. I've played the hell out of that game, and still do on occasion. It runs on my laptop under DOSBox.
That is not natural selection, that is selective breeding.
A 12-year-old's body is not ready to give birth, she will probably die or be damaged for life. But if all you want to have is lots of children, you probably don't care about their mother anyway. You'll just bring the kids up yourself after she dies, right?
My parents married when they were 21 and had four children.
Paedo nonce and ISIS-supporting.
Almost the Trifecta of subhumanity with the Josh Buggar-esque reference: 'how many 16 , 17 or 18 yr old boys have been charged with statutory rape when they had sex with their 14 or 15 yr old girlfriend'.
Gotta keep it in the family, eh redneck trailer-trash neo-Nazis?!
"A young woman such a 12yo marries a older man that has establishes himself is a [the sexual abuse of a minor child]"
FTFY, you cretinous mouth-breathing imbecile.
"Age certainly is relevant. how many 16 , 17 or 18 yr old boys have been charged with statutory rape when they had sex with their 14 or 15 yr old girlfriend."
In the USA? Quite a few, actually,according to what I read. Let's take the example of a pair of 14 years old lovebirds caught while they were consensually and enthusiastically messing around. It tends to vary according to the state's exact laws and the sanity level of the judge, but there are parts of the US where a judge sticking to the letter of the law can have one or both of the kids registered as a child molester on the sex offenders registry, since technically they're both guilty of statutory rape on each other. So now you have two kids subjected to part or all of the same restrictions imposed upon a registered sex offender who raped babies and shared vids of it on the net, such as not being allowed to be unsupervised around minors (including their siblings), the kind of restriction on where they are allowed to live that resulted in the creation of sex offenders camps under an overpass because there was no place in the city that wasn't too close to a place where children gather, potentially even not being allowed into school or libraries, which, combined with the usual prohibition against touching a computer/accessing the Internet means that they will be unable to complete their education, etc. Hell, I'm aware of at least one case where a wannabe vigilante picked such a kid at random on the sex offender registry and murdered him: details like the fact that the minor he had "raped" had been his consenting girlfriend and that he was minor himself at the time had no been mentionned in his registry file...
"So what if a 22 yr guy marries a 12 yr old girl. Its none of anyone's business."
Teens with a couple of years of age difference between them (and near or above the usual age of consent in the EU) are not the same thing as an adult man marrying a tween ten years younger than him...
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.